Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  X. v. NETHERLANDS

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 6 Art. 1, Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EKMR, 09.05.1986 - 12102/86

  Y-N. et consorts contre la SUISSE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 16.01.1991 - 15216/89

  However, the decision of a Contracting State to deport a person may give rise to an issue under Article 3 of the Convention, and hence engage the responsibility of that State under the Convention, where there is a risk that a person, if deported, will be subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention in the receiving country (see Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 35 et seq., para. 91; No. 12102/86, Dec. 9.5.86, D.R. 47 p. 286).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EKMR, 16.01.1991 - 15216/89

  However, the decision of a Contracting State to deport a person may give rise to an issue under Article 3 of the Convention, and hence engage the responsibility of that State under the Convention, where there is a risk that a person, if deported, will be subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention in the receiving country (see Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 35 et seq., para. 91; No. 12102/86, Dec. 9.5.86, D.R. 47 p. 286).

• EKMR, 10.09.1993 - 22406/93

  S.N. v. SWITZERLAND

  In this respect, the Commission recalls that it has left open whether Article 1 of Protocol No. 6 (P6-1) to the Convention engages the responsibility of a State, such as Switzerland which has ratified this Protocol, where, upon deportation, the person concerned faces a real risk of being subjected to the death penalty in the receiving State (see No. 15216/89, Dec. 16.1.91, to be published in D.R.).