Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 28356/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,26796) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
STYK v. POLAND
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 19.07.1995 - 17506/90
KEROJÄRVI v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 28356/95
Finally, the result of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question (Eur. Court HR, Kerojärvi v. Finland judgment of 19 July 1995, Series A no. 322, p. 12, para. 32).
- EGMR, 28.04.2009 - 38886/05
RASMUSSEN v. POLAND
It was observed that the 1991 Act was partly intended as a condemnation of the political role which the communist security service had played in repressing political opposition to the communist system and that such considerations of public policy, even if they resulted in the reduction of social insurance benefits, did not affect the property rights stemming from the social insurance system in a manner contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. I. (see Styk v. Poland (dec.), no. 28356/95, 16 April 1998; Szumilas v. Poland (dec.), no 35187/97, 1 July 1998; Bienkowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 33889/97, 9 September 1998).