Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 28910/95 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS IN FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION c. ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS IN FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 34 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 06.02.1976 - 5589/72
SCHMIDT ET DAHLSTRÖM c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 28910/95
It refers to Convention case law which has held that a union may have the standing of a victim under Article 25 (Art. 25) (Eur. Court HR, National Union of Belgian Police v. Belgium judgment of 27 October 1975, Series A no. 19 and Eur. Court HR, Schmidt and Dahlström v. Sweden judgment of 6 February 1976, Series A no. 21).The right to strike is an important aspect of that protection, but it is not expressly enshrined in Article 11 (Art. 11) and may be subject under national law to regulation of a kind that limits its exercise in certain circumstances (Eur. Court HR, Schmidt and Dahlström v. Sweden judgment of 6 February 1976, Series A no. 21, p. 16, para. 36).
- EGMR, 02.09.1998 - 22954/93
AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 28910/95
1 (Art. 11-1) of the Convention, of the right "to form and to join trade unions", and recalls that a trade union may claim to be a victim of alleged violations of its own rights (cf. Eur. Court HR, National Union of Belgian Police v. Belgium judgment of 27 October 1975, Series A no. 19, p. 18, para. 39), and that a trade union may be able to claim to be the victim of a violation of Article 11 (Art. 11) of the Convention where the right to join a trade union is completely removed (cf. No. 11603/85, Council of Civil Service Unions et al. v. the United Kingdom, Dec. 20.1.87, D.R. 50, p. 228, where the question of the union's standing was not expressly addressed; see also, as an example of a case where the union did not have such status, No. 22954/93, Ahmed and others v. the United Kingdom, Dec. 12.9.95). - EKMR, 20.01.1987 - 11603/85
COUNCIL OF CIVIL SERVICE UNIONS et autres c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 28910/95
1 (Art. 11-1) of the Convention, of the right "to form and to join trade unions", and recalls that a trade union may claim to be a victim of alleged violations of its own rights (cf. Eur. Court HR, National Union of Belgian Police v. Belgium judgment of 27 October 1975, Series A no. 19, p. 18, para. 39), and that a trade union may be able to claim to be the victim of a violation of Article 11 (Art. 11) of the Convention where the right to join a trade union is completely removed (cf. No. 11603/85, Council of Civil Service Unions et al. v. the United Kingdom, Dec. 20.1.87, D.R. 50, p. 228, where the question of the union's standing was not expressly addressed; see also, as an example of a case where the union did not have such status, No. 22954/93, Ahmed and others v. the United Kingdom, Dec. 12.9.95).