Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 24399/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,31734) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MENNIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65
DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 24399/94
The Commission notes that the applicant is effectively seeking a second appeal court and that there is no such entitlement under the Convention (see Eur. Court HR, Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11 pp. 14-15, para. 25 relating to the right to a first court of appeal, No. 10153/82, Dec. 13.10.86, D.R. 49 p. 67). - EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79
PIERSACK v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 24399/94
Secondly, the tribunal must also be impartial from an objective view point, that is, it must offer sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see, for instance, (see e.g. Eur. Court HR, Pullar v. United Kingdom, judgment of 10 June 1996, para. 30 (to be published), Piersack v. Belgium, judgment of 1 October 1982, Series A no. 53 p. 14 para. - EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87
EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 24399/94
1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention (see Eur. Court HR, Edwards v. United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, paras. 33-34 and other references there quoted).