Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 17.01.1996 - 29099/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,27446) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1996 - 29099/95
Furthermore, the Contracting States enjoy a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a different treatment in law; the scope of this margin will vary according to the circumstances, the subject matter and the background (Eur. Court H.R., Lithgow judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, pp. 66-67, para. 177). - EGMR, 23.10.1990 - 11581/85
DARBY v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1996 - 29099/95
However, such a difference in treatment will only be discriminatory within the meaning of Article 14 (Art. 14) of the Convention if the difference in treatment relates to personal status, has "no objective and reasonable justification" namely, if it does not pursue a "legitimate aim" and if there is no "reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised" (see, for example, Eur. Court H.R., Darby judgment of 23 October 1990, Series A no. 187, p. 12, para. 31). - EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90
FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1996 - 29099/95
More recently the Court has had occasion to consider the concept of privilege in its Fayed judgment (Eur. Court H.R., Fayed judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B) and the Commission considers it appropriate to follow the approach of the Court in that case for the purposes of the present application.