Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 26352/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,31784) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
G.G. v. GERMANY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65
DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 26352/95
However, according to the Convention organs' case-law, the right to appeal is not as such guaranteed by the Convention (see Eur. Court HR, Delcourt v. Belgium judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, p. 14, para. 25). - EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79
PIERSACK v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 26352/95
1 (Art. 6-1) does not require the legislature to regulate every detail in this area by formal Act of Parliament if the legislature establishes at least the organisational framework for the judicial organisation (cf. Zand v. Austria, Comm. Report 12.10.78, D.R. 15, p. 80; see also Eur. Court HR, Piersack v. Belgium judgment of 1 October 1982, Series A no. 53, p. 16, para. 33). - EGMR, 25.02.1992 - 10802/84
PFEIFER ET PLANKL c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 26352/95
Moreover, in the case of procedural rights, as in the present case, the waiver, in order to be effective for Convention purposes, requires minimum guarantees commensurate to its importance (see Eur. Court HR, Pfeifer and Plankl v. Austria judgment of 25 February 1992, Series A no. 227, pp. 16-17, para. 37).