Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 29335/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,26465) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CANNON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87
EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 29335/95
In 1995 in R. v. Winston Brown (1995, 1 Cr. App. R. 191) the Court of Appeal reviewed the operation of Guidelines issued in 1981 by the Attorney General to prosecution counsel concerning exceptions to the common-law duty to disclose to the defence certain evidence of potential assistance to it (cf. Eur. Court H.R., the Edwards judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B).In the circumstances of the present case, it finds it unnecessary to consider the relevance of paragraphs 3 (b) and 3 (d) to the case since the applicant's allegations, in any event, amount to a complaint that the proceedings have been unfair (cf. Eur. Court HR, the Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, p. 34, para. 33).
- EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 29335/95
The Commission's task is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (cf. Eur. Court HR, the Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, para. 33). - EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88
IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 29335/95
In assessing whether defence rights have been secured under Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention, the Commission must consider the proceedings in question as a whole, including the proceedings before the appellate court (cf. Eur. Court HR, the Helmers v. Sweden judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212, p. 15, para. 31; the Imbrioscia v. Switzerland judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, pp. 13- 14, para. 38).