Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HENZI v. SWITZERLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. a MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 27.11.1987 - 9976/82

  BEN YAACOUB v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 24544/94

  The Commission must therefore analyse the role of the Court when accepting the prosecution's requests for aggravation of the accusation and the extent to which the decisions taken on these requests could indicate a preconceived opinion on the guilt of the accused (see Eur. Court H.R., De Cubber judgment of 26.10.1984, Series A no. 86, pp. 14, para. 26; Ben Yaacoub judgment of 27.11.1987, Series A no. 127, pp. 11-16, paras. 98-114).
• EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77

  CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 24544/94

  One element to be considered is whether the accused himself has requested adjournment of the hearing in order adequately to prepare his defence (Eur. Court H.R., Campbell and Fell judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, p. 45, para. 98).
• EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

  DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 24544/94

  The Commission must therefore analyse the role of the Court when accepting the prosecution's requests for aggravation of the accusation and the extent to which the decisions taken on these requests could indicate a preconceived opinion on the guilt of the accused (see Eur. Court H.R., De Cubber judgment of 26.10.1984, Series A no. 86, pp. 14, para. 26; Ben Yaacoub judgment of 27.11.1987, Series A no. 127, pp. 11-16, paras. 98-114).

 
• EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79

  PIERSACK v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 24544/94

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention may be assessed by means of a subjective approach, by endeavouring to ascertain the personal conviction of a given judge in a particular case, or by an objective approach, by determining whether he offered sufficient guarantees to preclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (Eur. Court H.R., Piersack judgment of 1.10.1982, Series A no. 53, pp. 14-15, para. 30).
• EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 12151/86

  F.C.B. c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 24544/94

  As the requirements of paragraph 3 of Article 6 (Art. 6-3) are to be seen as particular aspects of the right to a fair trial guaranteed by paragraph 1, the Commission will examine the complaints under both paragraphs taken together (cf. F.C.B. v. Italy judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 208-B, p. 20, para. 29).
• EKMR, 12.03.1981 - 8490/79

  X. c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 24544/94

  In addition, because of the logical link between subparagraphs 3(a) and (b) of Article 6 (Art. 6-3-a, 6-3-b), the information about the nature and cause of the accusation must be adequate to enable the accused to prepare his defence accordingly (No. 524/59, Dec. 19.12.60, Yearbook 3 pp. 322, 344; No 8490/79, Dec. 12.3.81, D.R. 22 p. 140).