Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 19.01.1998 - 26668/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,36058) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 26668/95
- EKMR, 19.01.1998 - 26668/95
- EGMR, 14.02.2002 - 26668/95
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EKMR, 12.10.1988 - 11921/86
KONTAKT-INFORMATION-THERAPIE AND HAGEN v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.01.1998 - 26668/95
The Commission recalls, however, that this condition is fulfilled if the complaint made before it has been raised at least in substance in the domestic proceedings and that the condition does, therefore, not necessarily require a particular reference to the Convention (cf. No. 11921/86, Dec. 12.10.88, D.R. 57, p. 81; No. 16278/90, Dec. 3.5.93, D.R. 74, p. 93). - EKMR, 03.05.1993 - 16278/90
KARADUMAN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.01.1998 - 26668/95
The Commission recalls, however, that this condition is fulfilled if the complaint made before it has been raised at least in substance in the domestic proceedings and that the condition does, therefore, not necessarily require a particular reference to the Convention (cf. No. 11921/86, Dec. 12.10.88, D.R. 57, p. 81; No. 16278/90, Dec. 3.5.93, D.R. 74, p. 93). - EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88
HENTRICH v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.01.1998 - 26668/95
Moreover, Article 26 (Art. 26) must be applied with some degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism (cf. Eur. Court HR, Hentrich v. France judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, p. 17, para. 30; and K.-F. v. Germany judgment of 27 November 1997, to be published in Reports 1997, para. 46).