Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 19.10.1995 - 26596/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1995,24624) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KREMERS v. the NETHERLANDS
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EKMR, 05.04.1994 - 21283/93
TYLER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.10.1995 - 26596/95
It is not competent to deal with a complaint alleging that errors of law or fact have been committed by domestic authorities, except where it considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of any of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention (cf. No. 21283/93, Dec. 5.4.94, D.R. 77, pp. 81 and 88). - EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87
PADOVANI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.10.1995 - 26596/95
1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention must be determined according to a subjective test, that is on the basis of the personal conviction of a particular judge in a given case, and also according to an objective test, that is ascertaining whether the judge offered guarantees sufficient to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (Eur. Court H.R., Hauschildt judgment of 24 May 1989, Series A no. 154, p. 21, para. 46, and Padovani judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-B, p. 20, para. 25). - EGMR, 26.05.1988 - 10563/83
EKBATANI v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.10.1995 - 26596/95
It is normally for the national courts to decide whether it is necessary or advisable to hear a witness (cf. No. 8231/78, Dec. 6.3.82, D.R. 28, p. 5, No. 10563/83, Dec. 5.7.85, D.R. 44, p. 113; Eur. Court H.R., Bricmont judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, para. 89).
- EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83
HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.10.1995 - 26596/95
1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention must be determined according to a subjective test, that is on the basis of the personal conviction of a particular judge in a given case, and also according to an objective test, that is ascertaining whether the judge offered guarantees sufficient to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (Eur. Court H.R., Hauschildt judgment of 24 May 1989, Series A no. 154, p. 21, para. 46, and Padovani judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-B, p. 20, para. 25). - EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 14861/89
LALA c. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.10.1995 - 26596/95
1 and 3 (Art. 6-1, 6-3) taken together, since the guarantees in paragraph 3 of Article 6 (Art. 6-3) represent constituent elements of the general concept of a fair hearing set forth in paragraph 1 (Art. 6-1) of this provision (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Lala judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 297-A, p. 12, para. 26). - EKMR, 06.03.1982 - 8231/78
X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.10.1995 - 26596/95
It is normally for the national courts to decide whether it is necessary or advisable to hear a witness (cf. No. 8231/78, Dec. 6.3.82, D.R. 28, p. 5, No. 10563/83, Dec. 5.7.85, D.R. 44, p. 113; Eur. Court H.R., Bricmont judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, para. 89). - EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82
BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 19.10.1995 - 26596/95
It is normally for the national courts to decide whether it is necessary or advisable to hear a witness (cf. No. 8231/78, Dec. 6.3.82, D.R. 28, p. 5, No. 10563/83, Dec. 5.7.85, D.R. 44, p. 113; Eur. Court H.R., Bricmont judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, para. 89).