Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 20.10.1997 - 33977/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,31329) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 20.10.1997 - 33977/96
- EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 33977/96
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EKMR, 20.10.1997 - 33977/96
The Government, referring to the Tyrer case (Eur. Court HR, judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26), also submit that the applicant's suffering has not attained such a level or intensity as would be indicative of an inhuman or degrading treatment. - EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64
Wemhoff ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 20.10.1997 - 33977/96
The Government conclude, referring to the criteria laid down in Wemhoff v. Germany (Eur. Court HR, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7) that, taking into account the responsibility of the applicant for most of the delays, the "reasonable time" within the meaning of Article 5 para. - EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83
HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK
Auszug aus EKMR, 20.10.1997 - 33977/96
The applicant replies that his case is very similar to the case of Hauschildt v. Denmark (Eur. Court HR, judgment of 24 May 1989, Series A no. 154) in that the same judge rejected his requests for release on bail seven times during the trial. - EGMR, 24.09.1992 - 10533/83
HERCZEGFALVY c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EKMR, 20.10.1997 - 33977/96
The Convention organs must nevertheless satisfy themselves that the medical necessity has been convincingly shown to exist (Eur. Court HR, Herczegfalvy v. Austria judgment of 24 September 1992, Series A no. 244, p. 26 para. 83).