Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 33745/96   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1998,33628
EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 33745/96 (https://dejure.org/1998,33628)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 21.05.1998 - 33745/96 (https://dejure.org/1998,33628)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 21. Mai 1998 - 33745/96 (https://dejure.org/1998,33628)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,33628) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 12945/87

    HADJIANASTASSIOU v. GREECE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 33745/96
    As to the Government's claim that the applicant should have appealed the refusal to hold the hearing in private, the Commission recalls that the purpose of the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies is to enable the State to have the opportunity to redress the alleged damage by domestic means within the framework of its own legal system before proceedings are brought in an international court (see No. 12945/87, Dec. 4.4.90, D.R. 65, p. 173).
  • EKMR, 09.12.1986 - 10938/84

    KAUFMAN contre la BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 33745/96
    In particular, the Commission must ascertain that every party to such proceedings has a reasonable opportunity of presenting his or her case to the court under conditions which do not place him or her at substantial disadvantage vis-a-vis the other party (see inter alia No. 10938/84, Dec. 9.12.86, D.R. 50, p. 115).
  • EKMR, 03.05.1993 - 19890/92

    ZIEGLER v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 33745/96
    The Commission refers, on this point, to its constant case- law (see, for example No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45; No. 19890/92, Dec. 3.5.93, D.R. 74 p. 234).
  • EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

    SCHENK c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 33745/96
    The Commission further recalls that Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is primarily a matter for regulation under national law (in the criminal context, see Schenk v. Switzerland judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, para. 46).
  • EGMR, 23.02.1994 - 16757/90

    STANFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 33745/96
    In assessing the fairness of proceedings the Commission must consider them as a whole and must ascertain that, in their entirety, they were fair (see, inter alia the Stanford v. the United Kingdom judgment of 23 February 1994, Series A no. 282-A, p. 10, para. 24).
  • EGMR, 07.08.1996 - 19092/91

    YAGIZ c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 33745/96
    The Commission further recalls that where there is a choice of several remedies open to the applicant, Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention must be applied in a manner corresponding to the reality of the applicant's situation in order to guarantee him or her effective protection of rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention and that it is in the first place for the applicant to select which legal remedy to pursue (see No. 19092/91, Dec. 11.10.93, D.R. 75, p. 207 with further reference on p. 215).
  • EKMR, 13.12.1979 - 7987/77

    COMPANY X. v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 33745/96
    The Commission refers, on this point, to its constant case- law (see, for example No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45; No. 19890/92, Dec. 3.5.93, D.R. 74 p. 234).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht