Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  T.M. v. FINLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  T.M. c. FINLANDE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 23.06.1994 - 16997/90

  DE MOOR c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1996 - 22377/93

  It recalls that it is normally not competent to deal with a complaint alleging that errors of law and fact have been committed by domestic courts, except where it considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of any of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or one of its Protocols, for instance in that a judgment has no legal justification and thereby violates a party's right to receive a fair trial (cf. Eur. Court HR, De Moor v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1994, para. 55, to be published in Series A no. 292-A; No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45).
• EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85

  H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1996 - 22377/93

  1 (Art. 6-1) (e.g., Eur. Court HR, Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171, p. 21, para. 69).
• EGMR, 18.02.1991 - 12033/86

  FREDIN c. SUÈDE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1996 - 22377/93

  The Commission's power to review compliance with domestic law is limited (e.g., Eur. Court HR, Fredin v. Sweden judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 192, pp. 16-17, para. 50).

 
• EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86

  LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1996 - 22377/93

  The task of the Convention organs is to ascertain whether the proceedings, considered as a whole, including the way in which evidence was taken and submitted, were fair (e.g., Eur. Court HR, Lüdi v. Switzerland judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 20, para. 43).
• EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13023/87

  SALESI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1996 - 22377/93

  It recalls that, as a general rule, this provision is applicable in the field of social insurance, including even welfare assistance (Eur. Court HR, Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263-A, p. 17, para. 46; Salesi v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-E, pp. 59-60, para. 19).
• EGMR, 19.07.1995 - 17506/90

  KEROJÄRVI v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1996 - 22377/93

  The Government stress that the case is distinguishable from the case of Kerojärvi v. Finland (Eur. Court HR, judgment of 19 July 1995, Series A no. 322) in that the present applicant, by virtue of his legal profession, was aware of his possibility of consulting the case-files and commenting on the various opinions as they had been reproduced without that material having been formally communicated to him.

• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 42454/02

  MENCHINSKAYA v. RUSSIA

  The Court further observes that the unemployment allowances at issue were individual and pecuniary in nature and were aimed at compensating for loss of means of subsistence resulting from unemployment (see T.M. v. Finland (dec.), no. 22377/93, 21 October 1996).