Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 21.10.1996 - 26669/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,31737) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TY v. THE NETHERLANDS
Art. 14+8, Art. 14, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74
MARCKX v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1996 - 26669/95
A difference in treatment is discriminatory if it "has no objective and reasonable justification", that is, if it does not pursue a "legitimate aim" or if there is not a "reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised" (see, inter alia, Eur. Court HR, Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 16, para. 33; Eur. Court HR, Rasmussen v. Denmark judgment of 28 November 1984, Series A no. 87, p. 14, para. 38; and Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali judgment, loc. cit., p. 35, para. 72). - EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80
ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1996 - 26669/95
Although the application of Article 14 (Art. 14) does not necessarily presuppose a breach of those provisions - and to this extent it is autonomous -, there can be no room for its application unless the facts at issue fall within the ambit of one or more of the latter (cf. Eur. Court HR, Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. United Kingdom judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 35, para. 71). - EGMR, 28.11.1984 - 8777/79
RASMUSSEN v. DENMARK
Auszug aus EKMR, 21.10.1996 - 26669/95
A difference in treatment is discriminatory if it "has no objective and reasonable justification", that is, if it does not pursue a "legitimate aim" or if there is not a "reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised" (see, inter alia, Eur. Court HR, Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 16, para. 33; Eur. Court HR, Rasmussen v. Denmark judgment of 28 November 1984, Series A no. 87, p. 14, para. 38; and Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali judgment, loc. cit., p. 35, para. 72).