Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 24.02.1997 - 19918/92   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1997,20408
EKMR, 24.02.1997 - 19918/92 (https://dejure.org/1997,20408)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 24.02.1997 - 19918/92 (https://dejure.org/1997,20408)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 24. Februar 1997 - 19918/92 (https://dejure.org/1997,20408)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,20408) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    FIRMA "BRAUEREI FELDSCHLÖSSCHEN FERDINAND GEIDEL KG", DAVIES, GEIDEL, THE ESTATE OF LOUISE GEIDEL AND LANDGRAF v. GERMANY

    Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
    Inadmissible (englisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SOCIETE «BRAUEREI FELDSCHLOSSCHEN FERDINAND GEIDEL» ET AUTRES c. ALLEMAGNE

    Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
    Irrecevable (französisch)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (6)

  • EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 37696/97

    VON RIGAL-VON KRIEGSHEIM v. GERMANY

    18890/91, 19048/91, 19049/91, 19342/92 and 19549/92 (Mayer et al. v. Germany, D.R. 85-A, p. 5) and of 24 February 1997 concerning Application No. 19918/92 (Geidel et al. v. Germany, unpublished), where similar complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) were declared inadmissible.

    The relevant part of this decision (No. 19918/92, Dec. 24.2.97, unpublished) reads as follows:.

    4.3.96, D.R. 85, p. 5; No. 19918/92, Dec.

  • EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 37255/97

    HEUER v. GERMANY

    18890/91, 19048/91, 19049/91, 19342/92 and 19549/92 (Mayer et al. v. Germany, D.R. 85-A, p. 5) and of 24 February 1997 concerning Application No. 19918/92 (Geidel et al. v. Germany, unpublished), where similar complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) were declared inadmissible.

    The relevant part of this decision (No. 19918/92, Dec. 24.2.97, unpublished) reads as follows:.

    4.3.96, D.R. 85, p. 5; No. 19918/92, Dec.

  • EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 36713/97

    GESCHÄFTSHAUS GmbH v. GERMANY

    18890/91, 19048/91, 19049/91, 19342/92 and 19549/92 (Mayer et al. v. Germany, D.R. 85-A, p. 5) and of 24 February 1997 concerning Application No. 19918/92 (Geidel et al. v. Germany, unpublished).

    As regards the incompatibility ratione materiae of claims that the regulations of the Unification Treaty interfered with rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1), the Commission held, in the above- mentioned decisions (Nos. 18890/91, 19048/91, 19049/91, 19342/92 and 19549/92 and No. 19918/92, op. cit.), as follows:.

    4.3.96, D.R. 85, p. 5; No. 19918/92, Dec.

  • EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 36265/97

    Z. v. GERMANY

    18890/91, 19048/91, 19049/91, 19342/92 and 19549/92 (Mayer et al. v. Germany, D.R. 85-A, p. 5) and of 24 February 1997 concerning Application No. 19918/92 (Geidel et al. v. Germany, unpublished).

    As regards the incompatibility ratione materiae of claims that the regulations of the Unification Treaty interfered with rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1), the Commission held, in the above- mentioned decisions (Nos. 18890/91, 19048/91, 19049/91, 19342/92 and 19549/92 and No. 19918/92, op. cit.), as follows:.

    4.3.96, D.R. 85, p. 5; No. 19918/92, Dec.

  • EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 34197/96

    KREMER-VIERECK AND VIERECK v. GERMANY

    18890/91, 19048/91, 19049/91, 19342/92 and 19549/92 (Mayer et al. v. Germany, D.R. 85-A, p. 5) and of 24 February 1997 concerning Application No. 19918/92 (Geidel et al. v. Germany, unpublished), where similar complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) were declared inadmissible.

    The relevant part of this decision (No. 19918/92, Dec. 24.2.97, unpublished) reads as follows:.

    4.3.96, D.R. 85, p. 5; No. 19918/92, Dec.

  • EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 35223/97

    PELTZER AND VON WERDER v. GERMANY

    The relevant part of this decision (No. 19918/92, Dec. 24.2.97, unpublished) reads as follows:.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht