Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 24.06.1996 - 29357/95   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1996,26532
EKMR, 24.06.1996 - 29357/95 (https://dejure.org/1996,26532)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 24.06.1996 - 29357/95 (https://dejure.org/1996,26532)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 24. Juni 1996 - 29357/95 (https://dejure.org/1996,26532)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,26532) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • BVerfG, 15.05.1995 - 2 BvL 19/91

    DDR-Spione

    Auszug aus EKMR, 24.06.1996 - 29357/95
    93a and 93b of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz) and to a decision of the Second Senate of 15 May 1995 (2 BvL 19/91 and others), which was attached to its decision in the first applicant's case.

    93a and 93b of the Federal Constitutional Court Act and to a decision of the Second Senate of 15 May 1995 (2 BvL 19/91 and others), which was attached to its decision in the second applicant's case.

    93a and 93b of the Federal Constitutional Court Act and to a decision of the Second Senate of 15 May 1995 (2 BvL 19/91 and others), which was attached to its decision in the third applicant's case.

  • EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83

    HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK

    Auszug aus EKMR, 24.06.1996 - 29357/95
    Furthermore, the Commission, having regard to the case-law of the Convention organs (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Hauschildt judgment of 24 May 1989, Series A no. 154, p. 22, paras. 50-51), considers that the applicants' complaint about the alleged lack of impartiality of the Federal Constitutional Court does not disclose any element of personal bias on the part of the judges having decided in the applicants' cases.
  • EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

    WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EKMR, 24.06.1996 - 29357/95
    However, the scope of review by the Convention organs is limited and it is in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see Eur. Court H.R., Winterwerp judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, p. 18, para. 39, p. 20, paras. 45-46; Eur. Commission H.R., No. 9997/82, Dec. 7.12.82, D.R. 31 p. 245).
  • EKMR, 07.12.1982 - 9997/82

    X. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 24.06.1996 - 29357/95
    However, the scope of review by the Convention organs is limited and it is in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see Eur. Court H.R., Winterwerp judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, p. 18, para. 39, p. 20, paras. 45-46; Eur. Commission H.R., No. 9997/82, Dec. 7.12.82, D.R. 31 p. 245).
  • EGMR, 28.10.1987 - 8695/79

    Inze ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EKMR, 24.06.1996 - 29357/95
    There can be no room for application of Article 14 (Art. 14) unless the facts of the case fall within the ambit of one or more of such provisions (Eur. Court H.R., Inze judgment of 28 October 1987, Series A no. 126, p. 17, para. 36).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht