Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 24.10.1995 - 22401/93 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1995,23089) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
D. F. v. UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 24.10.1995 - 22401/93
'Charge'... may be defined as 'the official notification given to an individual... of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence', a definition that also corresponds to the test whether 'the situation of the [suspect] has been substantially affected...'" (Eur. Court H.R., Eckle judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 33, para. 73). - EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 15346/89
MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EKMR, 24.10.1995 - 22401/93
2 (Art. 6-2) nor any other provision of the Convention contains an express right for a successful defendant to be awarded the costs incurred in defending a prosecution (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Masson and Van Zon judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A no. 327, para. 49).
- EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 35730/07
ASHENDON AND JONES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
The first applicant also submitted that his conduct was different to the conduct considered by the Court in D.F. v. the United Kingdom, no. 22401/93, Commission decision of 24 October 1995; and Fashanu v. the United Kingdom, no. 38440/97, Commission decision of 1 July 1998 (both unreported).In such circumstances, the question is whether the trial judge relied on suspicions as to the applicant's innocence after the applicant had been acquitted (ibid., § 30; see also Moody v. the United Kingdom, no. 22613/93, Commission's report of 16 October 1996, unpublished, and D.F. v. the United Kingdom, no. 22401/93, Commission decision of 24 October 1995, unreported, which both concerned Practice Directions on the making of defendants" costs orders).
- EGMR, 07.03.2006 - 8866/04
YASSAR HUSSAIN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Dans ces conditions, la question à trancher est celle de savoir si le juge du fond s'est fondé sur des soupçons quant à l'innocence du requérant après l'acquittement de ce dernier (ibidem, § 30, et Moody c. Royaume-Uni, no 22613/93, rapport de la Commission du 16 octobre 1996, non publié, et D.F. c. Royaume-Uni, no 22401/93, décision de la Commission du 24 octobre 1995, non publiée, deux affaires concernant les directives de procédure relatives au remboursement des dépens exposés par le défendeur).