Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KAREEM c. SUEDE

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 6 Art. 1 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KAREEM v. SWEDEN

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 6 Art. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EKMR, 09.11.1987 - 13162/87

  V.P. v. UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 25.10.1996 - 32025/96

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention (cf., e.g., No. 13162/87, P. v. the United Kingdom, Dec. 9.11.87, D.R. 54 p. 211).
• EKMR, 26.10.1995 - 27776/95

  A.G. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 25.10.1996 - 32025/96

  Moreover, the Commission recalls from its previous case-law that Chapter 8, Section 1 of the Aliens Act imposes an absolute obligation on the enforcement authority in Sweden to refrain from expelling an alien should the human rights situation in the receiving country constitute a firm reason to believe that he or she would be in danger of being subjected to capital or corporal punishment, or torture, in that country (cf., e.g., No. 27776/95, A.G. and Others v. Sweden, Dec. 26.10.95, D.R. 83 p. 101).
• EKMR, 20.01.1994 - 22742/93

  AYLOR-DAVIS v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 25.10.1996 - 32025/96

  Moreover, the Commission does not exclude the possibility that a Contracting State's responsibility might be engaged under Article 2 (Art. 2) of the Convention or Article 1 of Protocol No. 6 (P6-1) where a fugitive is extradited to a country where he is seriously at risk of being executed, as a result of the imposition of the death penalty or otherwise (cf. No. 22742/93, Aylor-Davis v. France, Dec. 20.1.94, D.R. 76 p. 164).

 
• EGMR, 18.02.1991 - 12313/86

  MOUSTAQUIM c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 25.10.1996 - 32025/96

  The Commission recalls that the expulsion of a person from a country in which close members of his family live may amount to an unjustified interference with his right to respect for his family life as guaranteed by Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention (cf., e.g., Eur. Court HR, Moustaquim v. Belgium judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 193, pp. 19-20, paras. 43-46).
• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87

  VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 25.10.1996 - 32025/96

  The Commission recalls that Contracting States have the right to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (cf., e.g., Eur. Court HR, Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, p. 34, para. 102).
• EGMR, 24.09.1992 - 11613/85

  KOLOMPAR c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 25.10.1996 - 32025/96

  As to the length of his detention, the issue which arises is whether it has ceased to be justified because the proceedings have not been pursued with the requisite speed (cf. Eur. Court HR, Kolompar v. Belgium judgment of 24 September 1992, Series A no. 235-C, p. 55, para. 36).

• EKMR, 20.10.1997 - 31007/96

  MUHADRI v. AUSTRIA

  The question, therefore, arises whether a contracting State's responsibility may be engaged under this Article where an alien is to be expelled to a State where he is seriously at risk of being sentenced to death (cf. No. 32025/96, Dec. 25.10.96, D.R. 87, p. 173 at p. 181).