Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 26.02.1997 - 27237/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,29140) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GOVELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13 MRK
Admissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71
Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 26.02.1997 - 27237/95
The applicant submits that in accordance with the Court's reasoning in Klass v. Germany, (Eur. Court HR judgment of 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28) and Malone v. United Kingdom (Eur. Court HR, judgment of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82), the installation of secret surveillance equipment and bugging devices can only be considered to be necessary in a democratic society, where there exist adequate safeguards against abuse, and that no such safeguards exist in this case. - EGMR, 02.08.1984 - 8691/79
MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 26.02.1997 - 27237/95
The applicant submits that in accordance with the Court's reasoning in Klass v. Germany, (Eur. Court HR judgment of 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28) and Malone v. United Kingdom (Eur. Court HR, judgment of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82), the installation of secret surveillance equipment and bugging devices can only be considered to be necessary in a democratic society, where there exist adequate safeguards against abuse, and that no such safeguards exist in this case.