Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  H.F. v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 14+8, Art. 14 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 22.04.1993 - 15070/89

  MODINOS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 26.06.1995 - 22646/93

  The Commission recalls that the prohibition of homosexual acts, even in the absence of any criminal proceedings, constitutes an interference with the rights under Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention of the persons concerned (see Eur. Court H.R., Dudgeon judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, p. 18, para. 41; Norris judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142, p. 17-18, paras. 35-38; Modinos judgment of 22 April 1993, Series A no. 259, p. 10-11, paras. 17-24).
• EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89

  SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 26.06.1995 - 22646/93

  However, very weighty reasons have to be put forward before a difference of treatment based exclusively on the ground of sex can be regarded as compatible with the Convention (see Eur. Court H.R., Schuler-Zgraggen judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, pp. 21-22, para. 67; Karlheinz Schmidt judgment of 18 July 1994, Series A no. 291 B, pp. 32-33, para. 24).
• EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83

  BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 26.06.1995 - 22646/93

  As a general rule it is for the national courts, and in particular the courts of first instance, to assess the evidence before them as well as the relevance of the evidence which the accused seeks to adduce (Eur. Court H.R., Barbera, Messegue and Jabardo judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no. 146, p. 31, para. 68).

 
• EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76

  DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 26.06.1995 - 22646/93

  The Commission recalls that the prohibition of homosexual acts, even in the absence of any criminal proceedings, constitutes an interference with the rights under Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention of the persons concerned (see Eur. Court H.R., Dudgeon judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, p. 18, para. 41; Norris judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142, p. 17-18, paras. 35-38; Modinos judgment of 22 April 1993, Series A no. 259, p. 10-11, paras. 17-24).
• EGMR, 26.10.1988 - 10581/83

  NORRIS c. IRLANDE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 26.06.1995 - 22646/93

  The Commission recalls that the prohibition of homosexual acts, even in the absence of any criminal proceedings, constitutes an interference with the rights under Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention of the persons concerned (see Eur. Court H.R., Dudgeon judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, p. 18, para. 41; Norris judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142, p. 17-18, paras. 35-38; Modinos judgment of 22 April 1993, Series A no. 259, p. 10-11, paras. 17-24).
• EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9120/80

  UNTERPERTINGER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 26.06.1995 - 22646/93

  In the circumstances of the present case, it will consider the applicant's complaint from the angle of paragraph 1 taken together with the principles inherent in paragraph 3 (d) of Article 6 (Art. 6-3-d) (see Eur. Court H.R., Unterpertinger judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 110, p. 14, para. 29).
• EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86

  VIDAL c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 26.06.1995 - 22646/93

  However, the complete silence of a judgment as to why the court rejected the hearing of a witness for the defence is not consistent with the concept of a fair trial which is the basis of Article 6 of the Convention (Eur. Court H.R., Vidal judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, paras. 33-34).

• EGMR, 22.11.2001 - 39392/98

  G.L. AND A.V. v. AUSTRIA

  They refer to the case-law of the Commission (cf. no. 17279/90 Z. v. Austria, decision 13.5.92, unpublished, and no. 22646/93, H.F. v. Austria, decision 26.6.95, unpublished) pointing out that it found no indication of a violation either of Article 8 alone or taken in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention in respect of section 209 of the Austrian Criminal Code.