Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CROISSANT v. GERMANY

  Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 14 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

In Nachschlagewerken

• Wikipedia
  +3

  Weitere Entscheidungen mit demselben Bezug

  EKMR, 27.02.1997 - 30454/96

  Klaus Croissant

  KG, 04.03.1993 - 3 StE 17/92

  Klaus Croissant

  BVerfG, 13.01.1976 - 2 BvR 981/75

  Verfassungsrechtliche Anforderungen an die Ausschließung eines Verteidigers - Dr.

  BGH, 22.10.1975 - 1 StE 1/74

  Verhandeln gegen einen seine Verhandlungsunfähigkeit herbeigeführt habenden

  (Wikipedia-Eintrag mit Bezug zur Entscheidung)

  Klaus Croissant

Verfahrensgang

• KG, 04.03.1993 - 3 StE 17/92
• EKMR, 27.02.1997 - 30454/96

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EKMR, 10.12.1975 - 6683/74

  X. v. the UNITED-KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.02.1997 - 30454/96

  It is not objectionable that the existing elements of the offence are clarified and adapted to new circumstances which can reasonably be brought under the original concept of the offence (cf. No. 6683/74, Dec. 10.12.75, D.R. 3, p. 95; No. 8710/79, Dec. 7.5.82, D.R. 28, p. 77; No. 13079/87, Dec. 6.3.89, D.R. 60, p. 256).
• EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

  KOKKINAKIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.02.1997 - 30454/96

  1 (Art. 7-1) confirms the general principle that legal provisions which interfere with individual rights must be adequately accessible, and formulated with sufficient precision to enable the citizen to regulate his conduct (cf. Eur. Court HR, Sunday Times v. United Kingdom judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 31, para. 49; Kokkinakis v. Grece judgment of 25 May 1993, Series A no. 260-A, p. 22, para. 52).
• EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74

  SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.02.1997 - 30454/96

  1 (Art. 7-1) confirms the general principle that legal provisions which interfere with individual rights must be adequately accessible, and formulated with sufficient precision to enable the citizen to regulate his conduct (cf. Eur. Court HR, Sunday Times v. United Kingdom judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 31, para. 49; Kokkinakis v. Grece judgment of 25 May 1993, Series A no. 260-A, p. 22, para. 52).

 
• EKMR, 24.06.1996 - 29742/96

  KUCHE c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.02.1997 - 30454/96

  The Commission has already found that, apart from the question whether individuals in these two groups were in analogous situations, the difference of treatment between them, in the application of the laws in force, had an objective and reasonable justification and did not amount to discrimination on political grounds (cf. No. 29742/96, Dec. 24.6.96, D.R. 86-A, p. 163).
• EGMR, 28.10.1987 - 8695/79

  Inze ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.02.1997 - 30454/96

  There can be no room for application of Article 14 (Art. 14) unless the facts of the case fall within the ambit of one or more of such provisions (Eur. Court HR, Inze v. Austria judgment of 28 October 1987, Series A no. 126, p. 17, para. 36).
• EKMR, 06.03.1989 - 13079/87

  G. v. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.02.1997 - 30454/96

  It is not objectionable that the existing elements of the offence are clarified and adapted to new circumstances which can reasonably be brought under the original concept of the offence (cf. No. 6683/74, Dec. 10.12.75, D.R. 3, p. 95; No. 8710/79, Dec. 7.5.82, D.R. 28, p. 77; No. 13079/87, Dec. 6.3.89, D.R. 60, p. 256).
• EKMR, 07.05.1982 - 8710/79

  X. Ltd. et Y. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.02.1997 - 30454/96

  It is not objectionable that the existing elements of the offence are clarified and adapted to new circumstances which can reasonably be brought under the original concept of the offence (cf. No. 6683/74, Dec. 10.12.75, D.R. 3, p. 95; No. 8710/79, Dec. 7.5.82, D.R. 28, p. 77; No. 13079/87, Dec. 6.3.89, D.R. 60, p. 256).