Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  H.N. v. ITALY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. a, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 7, Art. 9, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  H.N. c. ITALIE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. a, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 7, Art. 9, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75

  ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.10.1998 - 18902/91

  Waiver of the exercise of a right guaranteed by the Convention must be established in an equivocal manner (see Eur. Court HR, Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, p. 19, para. 35).
• EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 15974/90

  PRAGER ET OBERSCHLICK c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.10.1998 - 18902/91

  Journalistic freedom in particular also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (Eur. Court HR, Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 313, p. 19, para. 38).
• EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85

  CASTELLS v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.10.1998 - 18902/91

  The limits of permissible criticism are narrower in relation to a private citizen than in relation to politicians or Governments (cf. Eur. Court HR, Castells v. Spain judgment of 23 April 1992, Series A no. 236, p. 23, para. 46; and Incal v. Turkey judgment of 9 June 1998, para. 54, to be published in Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998).
• EGMR, 26.11.1991 - 13585/88

  OBSERVER ET GUARDIAN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.10.1998 - 18902/91

  This is especially so as far as the press is concerned, for news is a perishable commodity and to delay its publication, even for a short period, may well deprive it of all its value and interest (see Eur. Court HR, Observer and Guardian v. United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, p. 30, para. 60).

• EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 4099/12

  YEGER v. TURKEY

  Fourthly, the same consideration also holds true in respect of the mere fact of being abroad - a fact that was not contested by the applicant - which does not in and of itself suffice to provide an unequivocal indication in respect of the Government's argument (see Stoyanov-Kobuladze v. Bulgaria, no. 25714/05, § 41, 25 March 2014, and compare H.N. v. Italy, no. 18902/91, Commission decision of 27 October 1998, unreported, § 1).