Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PIAZZI v. ITALY

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. a, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64

  Wemhoff ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 24238/94

  The period to take into consideration began on 9 February 1989 when the applicant was arrested (see Eur. Court HR, Wemhoff v. Germany judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 26, para. 9) and ended on 23 August 1993, when the final judgment was deposited in the Registry.

  1 (a) (Art. 5-1-a), which authorises the lawful detention of a person after conviction by a competent court (cf. Eur Court H.R., Wemhoff v. Germany judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 23, para. 9; No. 20253/92, G.P. v. Italy, Dec. 6.4.95, unpublished).

• EKMR, 06.04.1995 - 20253/92

  G.P. contre l'ITALIE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 24238/94

  1 (a) (Art. 5-1-a), which authorises the lawful detention of a person after conviction by a competent court (cf. Eur Court H.R., Wemhoff v. Germany judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 23, para. 9; No. 20253/92, G.P. v. Italy, Dec. 6.4.95, unpublished).
• EKMR, 28.06.1995 - 22717/93

  G.S. contre l'ITALIE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 24238/94

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention has been exceeded in the present case (see No. 22717/93, Dec. 28.6.95, unpublished).

 
• EKMR, 05.04.1994 - 21283/93

  TYLER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 24238/94

  The Commission refers to its established case-law (cf., e.g., No. 13926/88, Dec. 4.10.90, D.R. 66 pp. 209, 225; No. 21283/93, Dec. 5.4.94, D.R. 77-A pp. 81, 82 and 88).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

  EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 24238/94

  The Commission recalls that the question of the admissibility of evidence and of its probative value is primarily governed by the rules of domestic law, and as a general rule it is for the national courts and in particular the courts of first instance, to assess the evidence before them, as well as the evidence which the accused seeks to adduce (see Eur. Court H. R., Edwards v. United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, para. 34; Windisch v. Austria judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 186, p. 10, para. 25).
• EGMR, 27.09.1990 - 12489/86

  Windisch ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 24238/94

  The Commission recalls that the question of the admissibility of evidence and of its probative value is primarily governed by the rules of domestic law, and as a general rule it is for the national courts and in particular the courts of first instance, to assess the evidence before them, as well as the evidence which the accused seeks to adduce (see Eur. Court H. R., Edwards v. United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, para. 34; Windisch v. Austria judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 186, p. 10, para. 25).
• EKMR, 06.10.1976 - 7306/75

  X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 24238/94

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention (No. 7306/75, Dec. 6.10.76, D.R. 7, p. 115).
• EKMR, 04.10.1990 - 13926/88

  N. c. DANEMARK

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 24238/94

  The Commission refers to its established case-law (cf., e.g., No. 13926/88, Dec. 4.10.90, D.R. 66 pp. 209, 225; No. 21283/93, Dec. 5.4.94, D.R. 77-A pp. 81, 82 and 88).
• EKMR, 09.05.1977 - 7628/76

  X. v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 24238/94

  The "detailed" information referred to in this provision should contain the material enabling the accused to prepare his defence, without however necessarily mentioning the evidence on which the charges are based (No. 7628/76, Dec. 9.5.77, D.R. 9 p. 173).