Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 28.02.1994 - 19130/91 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,25656) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DEMMER v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EKMR, 15.01.1993 - 15965/90
R.H. v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.02.1994 - 19130/91
1 of the Austrian Medical Practitioners' Act, i.e. a written reprimand, a fine or the - possibly probationary - suspension from practice, is, though important for the person's professional activity, of a disciplinary nature (cf., mutatis mutandis, Appl. No. 8496/79, Dec. 8.10.80, D.R. 21 p. 168; No. 9208/80, Dec. 10.7.81, D.R. 26 p. 262; No. 15965/90, Dec. 15.1.93 - not yet published). - EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75
ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.02.1994 - 19130/91
Unlike certain other disciplinary sanctions that might have been imposed (warning, censure and reprimand), the suspension at issue in these cases constituted a direct and material interference with the private right to continue to exercise the medical profession (Eur. Court H.R., Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment, loc. cit., pp. 20-22, paras. 45-50; Albert and Le Compte judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, p. 15, para. 28; Houart v. Belgium, Comm. Report 8.7.86, D.R. 53 p. 5). - EGMR, 23.10.1985 - 8848/80
BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.02.1994 - 19130/91
The dispute must be genuine and of a serious nature; civil rights and obligations must be the object - or one of the objects - of the dispute and the result of the proceedings must be directly decisive for such a right (cf., Eur. Court H.R., Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment, loc. cit., p. 21, para. 47; Benthem judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, pp. 14-15, para. 31).
- EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79
Öztürk ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.02.1994 - 19130/91
The Commission recalls the Court's case-law according to which the question whether proceedings relate to the determination of a criminal charge or are of a disciplinary nature should be examined in the light of specific criteria, namely the classification of the offence in domestic law, the nature of the offence and the severity of the sanction (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Engel and Others judgment, loc. cit.; Öztürk judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, pp. 18-20, paras. 50-53; Weber judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 177, pp. 17-18, paras. 30- 35). - EGMR, 22.05.1990 - 11034/84
WEBER c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.02.1994 - 19130/91
The Commission recalls the Court's case-law according to which the question whether proceedings relate to the determination of a criminal charge or are of a disciplinary nature should be examined in the light of specific criteria, namely the classification of the offence in domestic law, the nature of the offence and the severity of the sanction (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Engel and Others judgment, loc. cit.; Öztürk judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, pp. 18-20, paras. 50-53; Weber judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 177, pp. 17-18, paras. 30- 35). - EKMR, 10.07.1981 - 9208/80
SARAIVA DE CARVALHO v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.02.1994 - 19130/91
1 of the Austrian Medical Practitioners' Act, i.e. a written reprimand, a fine or the - possibly probationary - suspension from practice, is, though important for the person's professional activity, of a disciplinary nature (cf., mutatis mutandis, Appl. No. 8496/79, Dec. 8.10.80, D.R. 21 p. 168; No. 9208/80, Dec. 10.7.81, D.R. 26 p. 262; No. 15965/90, Dec. 15.1.93 - not yet published). - EKMR, 08.10.1980 - 8496/79
C. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.02.1994 - 19130/91
1 of the Austrian Medical Practitioners' Act, i.e. a written reprimand, a fine or the - possibly probationary - suspension from practice, is, though important for the person's professional activity, of a disciplinary nature (cf., mutatis mutandis, Appl. No. 8496/79, Dec. 8.10.80, D.R. 21 p. 168; No. 9208/80, Dec. 10.7.81, D.R. 26 p. 262; No. 15965/90, Dec. 15.1.93 - not yet published).