Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 28.06.1995 - 20619/92 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1995,28599) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BIRNLEITNER v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12235/86
ZUMTOBEL v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.06.1995 - 20619/92
However, she has not shown that she could not raise these complaints before the Administrative Court, in particular that she could not put forward any evidence which she regarded as pertinent (see Comm. Report 30.6.92, Zumtobel v. Austria, Eur. Court H.R., Series A no. 268-A, p. 22, para. 87).An important indication will be whether the court itself in the circumstances of the case considered that it lacked jurisdiction to examine the complaints raised (see Eur. Court H.R., Zumtobel judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, p. 14, para. 32; Ortenberg judgment of 25 November 1994, Series A no. 295-B, para. 34).
- EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.06.1995 - 20619/92
The applicant argues above all that her right to a court as guaranteed by Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention (see Eur. Court H.R., Golder judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, p. 18, para. 36) was violated in that the scope of the judicial review of the domestic courts which dealt with her case was too limited. - EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75
ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.06.1995 - 20619/92
1 (Art. 6-1) (see Eur. Court H.R., Albert and Le Compte judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, p. 16, para. 29).
- EGMR, 27.10.1987 - 10930/84
BODÉN v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.06.1995 - 20619/92
The situation complained of is alleged to be similar to that in the Bodén and Obermaier cases (see Eur. Court H.R., Bodén judgment of 27 October 1987, Series A no. 125-B and Obermaier judgment of 28 June 1990, Series A no. 179). - EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85
Obermeier ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.06.1995 - 20619/92
The situation complained of is alleged to be similar to that in the Bodén and Obermaier cases (see Eur. Court H.R., Bodén judgment of 27 October 1987, Series A no. 125-B and Obermaier judgment of 28 June 1990, Series A no. 179). - EGMR, 25.11.1994 - 12884/87
ORTENBERG c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.06.1995 - 20619/92
An important indication will be whether the court itself in the circumstances of the case considered that it lacked jurisdiction to examine the complaints raised (see Eur. Court H.R., Zumtobel judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, p. 14, para. 32; Ortenberg judgment of 25 November 1994, Series A no. 295-B, para. 34).