Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 28.11.1994 - 23895/94, 23987/94, 23988/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 28. November 1994 - 23895/94, 23987/94, 23988/94 (https://dejure.org/1994,27116)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,27116) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87
VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.11.1994 - 23895/94
The Commission recalls that the mere possibility of ill-treatment on account of the unsettled general situation in a country is in itself insufficient to give rise to a breach of Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention (cf. Eur. Court. H.R., Vilvarajah and others judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, p. 37, para. 111). - EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88
Jens Söring
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.11.1994 - 23895/94
However, expulsion may in exceptional circumstances involve a violation of the Convention, for example where there is a serious fear of treatment contrary to Articles 2 and 3 (Art. 2, 3) of the Convention in the country to which the person is to be expelled (cf. No. 10564/83, Dec. 10.12.84, D.R. 40 p. 262; mutatis mutandis Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 32 ff., para. 81 ff.). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.11.1994 - 23895/94
According to the constant case-law of the Convention organs it is necessary for the applicability of Article 13 (Art. 13) of the Convention to have an arguable claim in terms of the Convention (Eur. Court. H.R., Boyle and Rice judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, para. 52).