Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 28.11.1994 - 23956/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,27616) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EKMR, 18.07.1974 - 5712/72
X. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.11.1994 - 23956/94
The Commission's case-law indicates however that a prisoner has no right as such under the Convention to choose the place of his confinement and the separation of a detained person from his family and the hardship resulting from it are the inevitable consequences of detention (see eg. No. 5712/72, Dec. 18.7.74, Collection 46 p. 112). - EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77
CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.11.1994 - 23956/94
Only in exceptional circumstances will the detention of a prisoner a long way from his home or family infringe the requirements of Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention (see eg. 7819/77, Dec. 6.5.78, published in part, D.R. 14 p. 186). - EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.11.1994 - 23956/94
In this assessment of whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a different treatment, Contracting States enjoy a margin of appreciation which will vary according to the circumstances, subject-matter and background (see eg. Eur. Court H.R., Lithgow and others judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, pp. 66-67, para. 177).