Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 29.06.1992 - 17072/90   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1992,18691
EKMR, 29.06.1992 - 17072/90 (https://dejure.org/1992,18691)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 29.06.1992 - 17072/90 (https://dejure.org/1992,18691)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 29. Juni 1992 - 17072/90 (https://dejure.org/1992,18691)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1992,18691) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

    DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 29.06.1992 - 17072/90
    The Commission recalls that it is possible for a person to be "charged" within the meaning of Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention even where domestic law sees no charge (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Deweer judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 23, para. 44).
  • EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77

    CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EKMR, 29.06.1992 - 17072/90
    The nature of the "offence" and the degree of severity of the penalty that the person concerned risks incurring must then be considered (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Engel and others judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 34, para. 82, Eur. Court H.R. Óztürk judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, p. 18, para. 50; Eur. Court H.R., Campbell and Fell judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, pp. 35-38, paras. 70-73; Eur. Court H.R., Weber judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 177, pp. 17-18, paras. 31-34 and Eur. Court H.R., Demicoli judgment of 27 August 1991. Series A no. 210, para. 31).
  • EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79

    Öztürk ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EKMR, 29.06.1992 - 17072/90
    The nature of the "offence" and the degree of severity of the penalty that the person concerned risks incurring must then be considered (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Engel and others judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 34, para. 82, Eur. Court H.R. Óztürk judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, p. 18, para. 50; Eur. Court H.R., Campbell and Fell judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, pp. 35-38, paras. 70-73; Eur. Court H.R., Weber judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 177, pp. 17-18, paras. 31-34 and Eur. Court H.R., Demicoli judgment of 27 August 1991. Series A no. 210, para. 31).
  • EGMR, 22.05.1990 - 11034/84

    WEBER c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 29.06.1992 - 17072/90
    The nature of the "offence" and the degree of severity of the penalty that the person concerned risks incurring must then be considered (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Engel and others judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 34, para. 82, Eur. Court H.R. Óztürk judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, p. 18, para. 50; Eur. Court H.R., Campbell and Fell judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, pp. 35-38, paras. 70-73; Eur. Court H.R., Weber judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 177, pp. 17-18, paras. 31-34 and Eur. Court H.R., Demicoli judgment of 27 August 1991. Series A no. 210, para. 31).
  • EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87

    DEMICOLI v. MALTA

    Auszug aus EKMR, 29.06.1992 - 17072/90
    The nature of the "offence" and the degree of severity of the penalty that the person concerned risks incurring must then be considered (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Engel and others judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 34, para. 82, Eur. Court H.R. Óztürk judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, p. 18, para. 50; Eur. Court H.R., Campbell and Fell judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, pp. 35-38, paras. 70-73; Eur. Court H.R., Weber judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 177, pp. 17-18, paras. 31-34 and Eur. Court H.R., Demicoli judgment of 27 August 1991. Series A no. 210, para. 31).
  • EGMR, 23.03.2006 - 38258/03

    VAN VONDEL v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Cette conclusion n'est pas altérée par le fait qu'une procédure pénale fut par la suite intentée contre le requérant, cette circonstance étant dépourvue de pertinence pour la question de savoir s'il s'agissait, au travers de la procédure menée devant le commission d'enquête parlementaire, de décider du bien-fondé d'une accusation en matière pénale (voir I.P. c. Autriche, no 17072/90, décision de la Commission du 29 juin 1992).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht