Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 29.11.1995 - 22051/93 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1995,26604) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 23.06.1994 - 16997/90
DE MOOR c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 29.11.1995 - 22051/93
An exception could only be made where the Commission considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of any of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or one of its Protocols, for instance in that a judgment has no legal justification and thereby violates a party's right to receive a fair trial (cf. Eur. Court H.R., De Moor judgment of 23 June 1994, Series A no. 292-A, p. 18, para. 55; No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45). - EKMR, 09.12.1987 - 11123/84
TETE contre la FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 29.11.1995 - 22051/93
Where the alleged violation consists of a continuing situation, the six months' time- limit has no application unless and until that situation comes to an end (cf., e.g., No. 11123/84, Dec. 9.12.87, D.R. 54 pp. 52 et seq.). - EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86
LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 29.11.1995 - 22051/93
1 (Art. 6-1), the Commission has examined the application from the point of view of these two provisions taken together (e.g., Eur. Court H.R., Lüdi judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 20, para. 43). - EKMR, 13.12.1979 - 7987/77
COMPANY X. v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 29.11.1995 - 22051/93
An exception could only be made where the Commission considers that such errors might have involved a possible violation of any of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or one of its Protocols, for instance in that a judgment has no legal justification and thereby violates a party's right to receive a fair trial (cf. Eur. Court H.R., De Moor judgment of 23 June 1994, Series A no. 292-A, p. 18, para. 55; No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45). - EKMR, 05.07.1976 - 6821/74
HUBER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 29.11.1995 - 22051/93
5 (Art. 5-5) presupposes the finding of a violation of one of the preceding paragraphs of Article 5 (Art. 5) (see, e.g., No. 10371/82, Dec. 6.3.85, D.R. 42 p. 127; No. 6821/74, Dec. 5.7.76, D.R. 6 pp. 65, 69).