Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 30.06.1994 - 23389/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,19438) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SINGH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 30.06.1994 - 23389/94
- EKMR, 11.10.1994 - 23389/94
- EGMR, 21.02.1996 - 23389/94
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 25.10.1990 - 11787/85
THYNNE, WILSON AND GUNNELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 30.06.1994 - 23389/94
He considers that his position is akin to that of discretionary lifers after the expiry of the punitive phase of detention and relies on the reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Thynne, Wilson and Gunnell (Eur. Court H.R., Thynne, Wilson and Gunnell judgment of 25 October 1990, Series A no. 190-A).4 (Art. 5-4) does not grant an entitlement to a prisoner serving a mandatory life sentence to periodic judicial assessment of the grounds for his detention after the expiry of his tariff (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Weeks judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 114, and Thynne, Wilson and Gunnell judgment of 25 October 1990, Series A no. 190-A).
- EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9787/82
WEEKS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 30.06.1994 - 23389/94
4 (Art. 5-4) does not grant an entitlement to a prisoner serving a mandatory life sentence to periodic judicial assessment of the grounds for his detention after the expiry of his tariff (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Weeks judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 114, and Thynne, Wilson and Gunnell judgment of 25 October 1990, Series A no. 190-A). - EGMR, 21.02.1996 - 21928/93
HUSSAIN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 30.06.1994 - 23389/94
On 5 April 1994, the Commission decided to communicate the application to the Government, to ask for written observations on the admissibility and merits of the application and to invite the parties to an oral hearing to be held consecutively with the hearing in the case of Abed Hussain v. the United Kingdom, Application No. 21928/93.