Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOSKINEN v. FINLAND

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 13, Art. 14 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81

  POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 30.08.1994 - 20560/92

  In view of its above conclusion with regard to the complaint under Article 3 (Art. 13) of the Convention, the Commission considers that the applicant has no "arguable claim" of a breach of a violation of this provision which would warrant a remedy under Article 13 (Art. 13) (see Eur. Court H.R., Powell and Rayner judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, p. 20, para. 46).
• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9787/82

  WEEKS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 30.08.1994 - 20560/92

  In short, there must be a sufficient causal connection between the conviction and the deprivation of liberty at issue (Eur. Court H.R., Weeks judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 114, p. 23, para. 42; Eur. Court H.R., Thynne, Wilson and Gunnell judgment of 25 October 1990, Series A no. 190, pp. 26-27, para. 68 et seq.).
• EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EKMR, 30.08.1994 - 20560/92

  Such an examination is also relative and depends on all the circumstances of the case and, in particular, on the nature and context of the punishment itself and the manner and method of its execution (Eur. Court H.R., Tyrer judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, p. 15, para. 30).
• EGMR, 25.10.1990 - 11787/85

  THYNNE, WILSON AND GUNNELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 30.08.1994 - 20560/92

  In short, there must be a sufficient causal connection between the conviction and the deprivation of liberty at issue (Eur. Court H.R., Weeks judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 114, p. 23, para. 42; Eur. Court H.R., Thynne, Wilson and Gunnell judgment of 25 October 1990, Series A no. 190, pp. 26-27, para. 68 et seq.).

• EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 29328/95

  KOSKINEN v. FINLAND

  The first one (No. 20560/92) was declared inadmissible on 30 August 1994.

  The Commission finds that the applicant's present complaint is in substance essentially the same as one of his complaints in Application No. 20560/92 which was examined on 30 August 1994.

• EKMR, 09.04.1997 - 26753/95

  HELIN v. FINLAND

  Accordingly, there is, at least for the time being, a sufficient causal connection between the applicant's conviction and his incarceration as a dangerous recidivist (see No. 20560/92, Dec. 30.8.94; No. 21221/93, Dec. 28.6.95, neither published).