Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 31.03.1993 - 19011/91 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1993,26367) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
M.T.J. v. DENMARK
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79
PIERSACK v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 31.03.1993 - 19011/91
1 (Art. 6-1) must be determined according to a subjective test, that is on the basis of the personal conviction of a particular judge in a given case, and also according to an objective test, that is ascertaining whether the judge offered guarantees sufficient to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see, for example, Eur. Court H.R., Piersack judgment of 1 October 1982, Series A no. 53, p. 14, para. 30). - EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86
ASCH v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 31.03.1993 - 19011/91
As a rule, these rights require that the defendant be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him, either when he is making his statement or at a later stage of the proceedings (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Asch judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, p. 10, para. 27). - EKMR, 13.07.1983 - 9022/80
W. c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EKMR, 31.03.1993 - 19011/91
As regards the applicant's complaint concerning the performance of his defence counsel the Commission recalls first of all that it may not, under Article 25 (Art. 25) of the Convention, receive applications directed against private individuals, including lawyers (cf. for example No. 9022/80, Dec. 13.7.83, D.R. 33 p. 21).