Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof

  Deutsche Telekom/ Kommission

  (fremdsprachig)

Verfahrensgang

• EuG, 23.09.2020 - T-64/20
• EuG, 20.10.2020 - T-64/20
• EuG, 13.09.2023 - T-64/20
• EuG - T-64/20 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EuGH, 15.10.2021 - C-457/21

  Kommission/ Amazon.com u.a.

  Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2020 - T-64/20

  By order of the President of the Court of 15 October 2021, Commission v Amazon.com and Others (C-457/2021 P, not published, EU:C:2021:900), it was decided that the information redacted from the non-confidential version of the appeal and Annexes 1 and 5 thereto, lodged at the Court Registry on 6 August 2021 by Amazon.com Inc.
• EuGH, 17.11.2021 - C-457/21

  Kommission/ Amazon.com u.a.

  Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2020 - T-64/20

  By order of the President of the Court of 17 November 2021, Commission v Amazon.com and Others (C-457/21 P, not published, EU:C:2021:1054), it was decided that the information redacted from the non-confidential version of the response and Annex B.1 thereto, lodged at the Court Registry by Amazon on 7 October 2021, would be treated as confidential vis-à-vis Ireland and that that non-confidential version alone would be served, by the Registrar, on that Member State.
• EuGH, 14.12.2020 - C-465/20

  Kommission / Irland u.a.

  Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2020 - T-64/20

  However, where a party is requesting, vis-à-vis a party that intervened before the General Court, confidential treatment in respect of material produced before the Court of Justice which has already been treated as confidential vis-à-vis that same party in the proceedings at first instance, that same confidential treatment must, in principle, be maintained for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court of Justice (order of the President of the Court of 14 December 2020, Commission v Ireland and Others , C-465/20 P, not published, EU:C:2020:1027, paragraph 12 and the case-law cited).
• EuG, 12.05.2021 - T-816/17

  Kein selektiver Vorteil einer luxemburgischen Tochtergesellschaft des …

  Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2020 - T-64/20

  By its appeal, the European Commission seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 12 May 2021, Luxembourg and Amazon v Commission (T-816/17 and T-318/18, EU:T:2021:252; "the judgment under appeal'), by which the General Court annulled Commission Decision (EU) 2018/859 of 4 October 2017 on State aid SA.338944 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) implemented by Luxembourg to Amazon (OJ 2018 L 153, p. 1).
• EuGH, 10.05.2022 - C-457/21

  Kommission/ Amazon.com u.a.

  Auszug aus EuG, 20.10.2020 - T-64/20

  By order of the President of the Court of 10 May 2022, Commission v Amazon.com and Others (C-457/21 P, not published, EU:C:2022:392), it was decided that the information redacted from the non-confidential version of the Commission's reply and Annexes C.1 and C.3 thereto, lodged at the Court Registry on 6 April 2022 by Amazon, in agreement with the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, would be treated as confidential vis-à-vis Ireland and that that non-confidential version alone would be served, by the Registrar, on Ireland.

• EuG, 13.01.2022 - T-166/21

  Autorità di sistema portuale del Mar Ligure occidentale u.a./ Kommission

  En effet, les termes « solution du litige " renvoient à la décision finale demandée, telle qu'elle serait consacrée dans le dispositif de l'arrêt ou de l'ordonnance à intervenir (voir ordonnance du 20 octobre 2020, Deutsche Telekom/Commission, T-64/20, non publiée, EU:T:2020:524, point 16 et jurisprudence citée).

  En principe, un intérêt à la solution du litige ne saurait être considéré comme suffisamment direct que dans la mesure où cette solution est de nature à modifier la position juridique du demandeur en intervention (voir ordonnance du 20 octobre 2020, Deutsche Telekom/Commission, T-64/20, non publiée, EU:T:2020:524, point 17 et jurisprudence citée).

• EuG, 28.07.2023 - T-623/22

  SD/ EMA - Streithilfe - Zugang zu Dokumenten - Verweigerung des Zugangs aus …

  Grundsätzlich kann ein Interesse am Ausgang des Rechtsstreits nur insofern als hinreichend unmittelbar angenommen werden, als dieser Ausgang eine Änderung der Rechtsstellung des Streithilfeantragstellers bewirken könnte (vgl. Beschluss vom 20. Oktober 2020, Deutsche Telekom/Kommission, T-64/20, nicht veröffentlicht, EU:T:2020:524, Rn. 17 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung).