Rechtsprechung
EuGH, 15.07.2014 - C-675/13 P |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof
Zoo Sport / HABM
- EU-Kommission
Zoo Sport Ltd gegen Harmonisierungsamt für den Binnenmarkt (Marken, Muster und Modelle) (HABM).
[fremdsprachig]
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Zoo Sport / HABM
- Europäischer Gerichtshof (Verfahrensdokumentation)
Rechtsmittel - Gemeinschaftsmarke - Schwarz-weiße Bildmarke Zoo Sport - Widerspruch des Inhabers der Gemeinschaftswort- und -bildmarken mit den Wortelementen "ZOOT" und "SPORTS ZOOT SPORTS" - Teilweise Zurückweisung der Anmeldung
Verfahrensgang
- EuG, 16.10.2013 - T-455/12
- EuGH, 15.07.2014 - C-675/13 P
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EuGH, 02.09.2010 - C-254/09
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust / HABM - Rechtsmittel - Gemeinschaftsmarke - …
Auszug aus EuGH, 15.07.2014 - C-675/13
The appraisal of those facts and the assessment of that evidence thus does not, save where they distort the evidence, constitute a point of law which is subject, as such, to review by the Court of Justice on appeal (see, inter alia, judgments in Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v OHIM , C-254/09 P, EU:C:2010:488, paragraph 49 and the case-law cited, and Bolloré v Commission , C-414/12 P, EU:C:2014:301, paragraph 78).Such distortion must be obvious from the documents on the Court's file, without there being any need to carry out a new assessment of the facts and the evidence (see judgments in New Holland Ford v Commission , C-8/95 P, EU:C:1998:257, paragraph 72, and Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v OHIM , EU:C:2010:488, paragraph 50).
- EuGH, 08.05.2014 - C-414/12
Bolloré / Kommission
Auszug aus EuGH, 15.07.2014 - C-675/13
The appraisal of those facts and the assessment of that evidence thus does not, save where they distort the evidence, constitute a point of law which is subject, as such, to review by the Court of Justice on appeal (see, inter alia, judgments in Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v OHIM , C-254/09 P, EU:C:2010:488, paragraph 49 and the case-law cited, and Bolloré v Commission , C-414/12 P, EU:C:2014:301, paragraph 78). - EuG, 16.10.2013 - T-455/12
Zoo Sport / OHMI - K-2 (zoo sport)
Auszug aus EuGH, 15.07.2014 - C-675/13
By its appeal, Zoo Sport Ltd ("Zoo Sport') requests the Court of Justice to vary the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Zoo Sport v OHIM - K - 2 (Zoo Sport) , T-455/12, EU:T:2013:531 ("the judgment under appeal'), by which the General Court dismissed its action for annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 9 August 2012 (Case R 1395/2011-4) concerning opposition proceedings between K-2 Corp.
- EuGH, 04.07.2000 - C-352/98
Bergaderm und Goupil / Kommission
Auszug aus EuGH, 15.07.2014 - C-675/13
In that regard, the Court would point out that it follows from Article 256 TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Articles 168(1)(d) and 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court that an appeal must indicate precisely the contested elements of the judgment which the appellant seeks to have set aside as well as the legal arguments specifically advanced in support of the appeal (see, inter alia, judgments in Bergaderm and Goupil v Commission , C-352/98 P, EU:C:2000:361, paragraph 34, and Acino v Commission , C-269/13 P, EU:C:2014:255, paragraph 35). - EuGH, 10.04.2014 - C-269/13
Acino / Kommission - Rechtsmittel - Humanarzneimittel - Aussetzung des …
Auszug aus EuGH, 15.07.2014 - C-675/13
In that regard, the Court would point out that it follows from Article 256 TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Articles 168(1)(d) and 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court that an appeal must indicate precisely the contested elements of the judgment which the appellant seeks to have set aside as well as the legal arguments specifically advanced in support of the appeal (see, inter alia, judgments in Bergaderm and Goupil v Commission , C-352/98 P, EU:C:2000:361, paragraph 34, and Acino v Commission , C-269/13 P, EU:C:2014:255, paragraph 35). - EuGH, 28.05.1998 - C-8/95
New Holland Ford / Kommission
Auszug aus EuGH, 15.07.2014 - C-675/13
Such distortion must be obvious from the documents on the Court's file, without there being any need to carry out a new assessment of the facts and the evidence (see judgments in New Holland Ford v Commission , C-8/95 P, EU:C:1998:257, paragraph 72, and Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v OHIM , EU:C:2010:488, paragraph 50).