Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof

  Galp Energia España u.a. / Kommission

  (fremdsprachig)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof (Verfahrensdokumentation)

  Rechtsmittel gegen das Urteil des Gerichts (Achte Kammer) vom 16. September 2013, Galp Energia España u. a./Kommission (T"462/07), mit dem die Art. 1 und 3 der Entscheidung K(2007) 4441 endg. der Kommission vom 3. Oktober 2007 in einem Verfahren nach Artikel 81 [EG] ...

Verfahrensgang

• EuG, 16.09.2013 - T-462/07
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 16.07.2015 - C-603/13
• EuGH, 21.01.2016 - C-603/13
• EuGH, 28.04.2016 - C-603/13 P

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EuGH, 21.01.2016 - C-603/13

  Galp Energia España u.a. / Kommission - Rechtsmittel - Art. 81 EG - Kartelle - …

  Auszug aus EuGH, 28.04.2016 - C-603/13

  Le 21 janvier 2016, 1a Cour (cinquième chambre) a rendu l'arrêt Galp Energía España e.a./Commission (C-603/13 P, EU:C:2016:38).

  1) Le point 72 de l'arrêt du 21 janvier 2016, Galp Energía España e.a./Commission (C-603/13 P, EU:C:2016:38), doit être rectifié comme suit :.

• EuGH, 01.07.2010 - C-407/08

  Der Gerichtshof erhält die gegen die Knauf Gips KG wegen ihres …

  Auszug aus EuGH, 28.04.2016 - C-603/13

  « In that regard, as the Court has stated on many occasions, the scope of judicial review provided for in Article 263 TFEU extends to all the elements of Commission decisions relating to proceedings applying Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU which are subject to in-depth review by the General Court, in law and in fact, in the light of the pleas raised by the appellants (see, to that effect, judgments in KME Germany and Others v Commission, C-272/09 P, EU:C:2011:810, paragraphs 102 and 109 ; Chalkor v Commission, C-386/10 P, EU:C:2011:815, paragraphs 62 and 82 ; and Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Commission, C-295/12 P, EU:C:2014:2062, paragraphs 56 and 59) and taking into account all the elements submitted by the latter, whether those elements pre-date or post-date the contested decision, whether they were submitted previously in the context of the administrative procedure or, for the first time, in the context of the proceedings before the General Court, in so far as those elements are relevant to the review of the legality of the Commission decision (see, to that effect, judgment in Knauf Gips v Commission, C-407/08 P, EU:C:2010:389, paragraphs 87 to 92).
• EuGH, 08.12.2011 - C-272/09

  Der Gerichtshof bestätigt die Urteile des Gerichts und die Entscheidungen der …

  Auszug aus EuGH, 28.04.2016 - C-603/13

  « In that regard, as the Court has stated on many occasions, the scope of judicial review provided for in Article 263 TFEU extends to all the elements of Commission decisions relating to proceedings applying Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU which are subject to in-depth review by the General Court, in law and in fact, in the light of the pleas raised by the appellants (see, to that effect, judgments in KME Germany and Others v Commission, C-272/09 P, EU:C:2011:810, paragraphs 102 and 109 ; Chalkor v Commission, C-386/10 P, EU:C:2011:815, paragraphs 62 and 82 ; and Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Commission, C-295/12 P, EU:C:2014:2062, paragraphs 56 and 59) and taking into account all the elements submitted by the latter, whether those elements pre-date or post-date the contested decision, whether they were submitted previously in the context of the administrative procedure or, for the first time, in the context of the proceedings before the General Court, in so far as those elements are relevant to the review of the legality of the Commission decision (see, to that effect, judgment in Knauf Gips v Commission, C-407/08 P, EU:C:2010:389, paragraphs 87 to 92).
• EuGH, 10.07.2014 - C-295/12

  Der Gerichtshof weist das Rechtsmittel von Telefónica und Telefónica de España …

  Auszug aus EuGH, 28.04.2016 - C-603/13

  « In that regard, as the Court has stated on many occasions, the scope of judicial review provided for in Article 263 TFEU extends to all the elements of Commission decisions relating to proceedings applying Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU which are subject to in-depth review by the General Court, in law and in fact, in the light of the pleas raised by the appellants (see, to that effect, judgments in KME Germany and Others v Commission, C-272/09 P, EU:C:2011:810, paragraphs 102 and 109 ; Chalkor v Commission, C-386/10 P, EU:C:2011:815, paragraphs 62 and 82 ; and Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Commission, C-295/12 P, EU:C:2014:2062, paragraphs 56 and 59) and taking into account all the elements submitted by the latter, whether those elements pre-date or post-date the contested decision, whether they were submitted previously in the context of the administrative procedure or, for the first time, in the context of the proceedings before the General Court, in so far as those elements are relevant to the review of the legality of the Commission decision (see, to that effect, judgment in Knauf Gips v Commission, C-407/08 P, EU:C:2010:389, paragraphs 87 to 92).
• EuGH, 08.12.2011 - C-386/10

  Chalkor / Kommission - Rechtsmittel - Wettbewerb - Kartelle - Markt für …

  Auszug aus EuGH, 28.04.2016 - C-603/13

  « In that regard, as the Court has stated on many occasions, the scope of judicial review provided for in Article 263 TFEU extends to all the elements of Commission decisions relating to proceedings applying Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU which are subject to in-depth review by the General Court, in law and in fact, in the light of the pleas raised by the appellants (see, to that effect, judgments in KME Germany and Others v Commission, C-272/09 P, EU:C:2011:810, paragraphs 102 and 109 ; Chalkor v Commission, C-386/10 P, EU:C:2011:815, paragraphs 62 and 82 ; and Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Commission, C-295/12 P, EU:C:2014:2062, paragraphs 56 and 59) and taking into account all the elements submitted by the latter, whether those elements pre-date or post-date the contested decision, whether they were submitted previously in the context of the administrative procedure or, for the first time, in the context of the proceedings before the General Court, in so far as those elements are relevant to the review of the legality of the Commission decision (see, to that effect, judgment in Knauf Gips v Commission, C-407/08 P, EU:C:2010:389, paragraphs 87 to 92).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 08.12.2016 - C-89/15

  Riva Fire / Kommission

  55 Urteil vom 21. Januar 2016, Galp Energía España u. a./Kommission (C-603/13 P, EU:C:2016:328).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 08.12.2016 - C-88/15

  Ferriere Nord / Kommission

  55 Urteil vom 21. Januar 2016, Galp Energía España u. a./Kommission (C-603/13 P, EU:C:2016:328).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 08.12.2016 - C-85/15

  Feralpi / Kommission

  55 Urteil vom 21. Januar 2016, Galp Energía España u. a./Kommission (C-603/13 P, EU:C:2016:328).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 08.12.2016 - C-86/15

  Ferriera Valsabbia und Valsabbia Investimenti / Kommission

  55 Urteil vom 21. Januar 2016, Galp Energía España u. a./Kommission (C-603/13 P, EU:C:2016:328).