Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STASZEWSKA v. POLAND

  Art. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violations of Art. 3 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 10049/04

  In any event, the Court reiterates that in cases where an individual has an arguable claim under Article 3 of the Convention, the notion of an effective remedy entails, on the part of the State, a thorough and effective investigation capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, § 102, RJD 1998-VIII, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, ECHR 1999-XII, § 79).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 10049/04

  The question whether the purpose of the treatment was to humiliate or debase the victim is a further factor to be taken into account, but the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of violation of Article 3 (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, 6.4.2000, §§ 119-120, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 10049/04

  Moreover, a tort action would have at most resulted in an award of damages, whereas in cases of serious ill-treatment by State agents an alleged breach of Article 3 cannot be remedied exclusively through the payment of compensation (see, among many other authorities, Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 61, ECHR 2000-VII).

 
• EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

  REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 10049/04

  The same principle applies to alleged ill-treatment resulting in injury which takes place in the course of an applicant's arrest (see Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, §§ 23-24, Series A no. 269, and Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 68-78, ECHR 2000-XII).
• EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 30873/96

  EGMEZ c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 10049/04

  By force of that special obligation created by the Convention for domestic authorities in respect of arguable Article 3 claims, in the present case the applicant, by asking the Polish authorities to institute criminal proceedings into her allegations of ill-treatment, discharged her duty under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention to afford the Polish State an opportunity to put matters right through its own legal system before having to answer before an international body for the acts complained of (see, mutatis mutandis, Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873/96, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII).
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 10049/04

  There is no indication that the body search was conducted in a manner which could debase or humiliate the applicant (see, by contrast, Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 117, ECHR 2001-VIII, and Iwanczuk v. Poland, no. 25196/94, §§ 58-59, 15 November 2001).
• EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

  KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 10049/04

  The same principle applies to alleged ill-treatment resulting in injury which takes place in the course of an applicant's arrest (see Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, §§ 23-24, Series A no. 269, and Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 68-78, ECHR 2000-XII).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 10049/04

  In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 (see Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336).

• EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 20999/05

  Unmenschliche und erniedrigende Behandlung durch eine Nacktunterbringung in einer …

  Wird gegen eine Person, der die Freiheit entzogen wird, körperlicher Zwang angewendet, der durch ihr Verhalten nicht unbedingt erforderlich gemacht wurde, so beeinträchtigt dies die Menschenwürde dieser Person und stellt grundsätzlich eine Verletzung des in Artikel 3 anerkannten Rechts dar (siehe u.a. Ribitsch ./. Österreich, 4. Dezember 1995, Rdnr. 38, Serie A Band 336 und Staszewska ./. Polen, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 10049/04, Rdnr. 53, 3. November 2009).
• EGMR, 16.06.2022 - 44153/15

  SKORUPA v. POLAND

  The fluid nature of the incident - especially the applicant trying to walk away (see paragraphs 11-12 above) - would, in the Court's view, justify doing this even without clear warning (see paragraph 10 above, and, mutatis mutandis, Staszewska v. Poland, no. 10049/04, §§ 56-57, 3 November 2009).