Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 12.12.1985 - 10293/83 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1985,16538) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
B. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 10293/83 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 10293/83 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (7)
- EKMR, 28.11.1995 - 23413/94
L.C.B. c. ROYAUME-UNI
The Commission considers that the applicant's participation in the initial global application received by the Commission in April 1993 constituted sufficient introduction of her application before the Commission for the purposes of Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention (No. 10293/83 Dec. 12.12.85, D.R. 45 p. 41). - EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 28155/95
KUMAR v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
The Commission recalls its case-law according to which as regards complaints not included in the initial application itself, the running of the six months' time-limit under Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention is not interrupted until the date when the complaint is first submitted to the Commission (cf. No. 10293/83, Dec. 12.12.85, D.R. 45 p. 41; No. 10857/84, Dec. 15.7.86, D.R. 48 p. 106). - EKMR, 25.11.1996 - 28574/95
ULLAH c. ROYAUME-UNI
Furthermore, even assuming that no effective domestic remedies were available to him in this respect, the Commission recalls that as regards complaints not included in the initial application itself, the running of the six months' time- limit under Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention is not interrupted until the date when the complaint is first submitted to the Commission (cf. No. 10293/83, Dec. 12.12.85, D.R. 45, p. 41; No. 10857/84, Dec. 15.7.86, D.R. 48, p. 106).
- EKMR, 29.11.1995 - 23860/94
KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
In particular, it referred to no domestic decisions which were being challenged, and gave no hint as to the Convention issues which could be raised (for an example of a letter which did comply with Rule 44 (4), see No. 10293/83, Dec. - EKMR, 27.06.1996 - 20005/92
PROSA, SJØGREN, AUGSBURG AND LIEDECKE v. DENMARK
Nevertheless, the Commission considers that the telefax letter submitted on 20 September 1991 was sufficient to constitute the introduction of an application since it set out, albeit summarily, the object of the application (cf. No. 10293/83, Dec. 12.12.85, D.R. 45 p. 41). - EKMR, 18.05.1995 - 22520/93
JOHNSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
The Commission recalls that the running of the period of six months, set out in Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention, is not interrupted until the date when the complaint is first submitted to the Commission (cf. No. 10293/83, Dec. 12.12.85, D.R. 45 p. 41). - EKMR, 09.12.1987 - 10942/84
Q. v. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
The Commission recalls that it has held that in certain cases the reactions of the authorities to the opinions held or expressed by individuals, including those employed in public service, may raise issues under Articles 10 and 11 (Art. 10, 11) of the Convention (No. 9228/80, Comm. Rep. 11.5.84; No. 10293/83, Dec. 12.12.85 (to be published in DR 45); No. 11603/85, Dec 20.1.87 (to be published)).