Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MIHAI TOMA v. ROMANIA

  Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 7 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Toma v. Romania

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06
• EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 1051/06

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

  Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  It reiterates that it is master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts and as it could decide to examine the complaint submitted to it under more than one of the Convention's provisions (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 54, ECHR 2009-...).

  The Court makes reference to the well-established principles developed in its case-law in the context of Article 7 of the Convention (see, notably, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260-A; Dragotoniu and Militaru-Pidhorni v. Romania, nos. 77193/01 and 77196/01, §§ 33-38, 24 May 2007; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §§ 139-141, ECHR 2008-...; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, §§ 105-110, 20 January 2009; and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 92-109, 17 September 2009).

• EGMR, 09.02.1995 - 17440/90

  WELCH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  Other factors that may be taken into account as relevant in this connection are the nature and purpose of the measure in question; its characterisation under national law; the procedures involved in the making and implementation of the measure; and its severity (see Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, §§ 27-28, Series A no. 307-A).

  It follows that the exception raised by the Government is inadmissible (see also Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, § 28, Series A no. 307-A).

• EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

  KOKKINAKIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  The Court makes reference to the well-established principles developed in its case-law in the context of Article 7 of the Convention (see, notably, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260-A; Dragotoniu and Militaru-Pidhorni v. Romania, nos. 77193/01 and 77196/01, §§ 33-38, 24 May 2007; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §§ 139-141, ECHR 2008-...; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, §§ 105-110, 20 January 2009; and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 92-109, 17 September 2009).

 
• EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 21906/04

  KAFKARIS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  The Court makes reference to the well-established principles developed in its case-law in the context of Article 7 of the Convention (see, notably, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260-A; Dragotoniu and Militaru-Pidhorni v. Romania, nos. 77193/01 and 77196/01, §§ 33-38, 24 May 2007; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §§ 139-141, ECHR 2008-...; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, §§ 105-110, 20 January 2009; and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 92-109, 17 September 2009).
• EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 15917/89

  JAMIL v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  In the instant case, the Court notes that under the Emergency Ordinance the annulment of the driving licence was no longer left to the police's discretion, but became automatic for cases like the applicant's (contrast Coëme and Others, cited above, § 149; mutatis mutandis, Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, § 32, Series A no. 317-B; and M. v. Germany, no. 19359/04, §§ 127-128, 17 December 2009.
• EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 75909/01

  Sud Fondi S.r.l. u.a. ./. Italien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 1051/06

  The Court makes reference to the well-established principles developed in its case-law in the context of Article 7 of the Convention (see, notably, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260-A; Dragotoniu and Militaru-Pidhorni v. Romania, nos. 77193/01 and 77196/01, §§ 33-38, 24 May 2007; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §§ 139-141, ECHR 2008-...; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, §§ 105-110, 20 January 2009; and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 92-109, 17 September 2009).