Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 29.10.2013 - 11160/07 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
D.F. v. LATVIA
Art. 3, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Non-pecuniary damage - award ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
D. F. v. Latvia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (8) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 03.06.2003 - 33343/96
PANTEA c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2013 - 11160/07
The Court, in its case-law with regard to the protection of vulnerable prisoners, has clarified that the national authorities have an obligation to take all steps reasonably expected to prevent real and immediate risks to prisoners" physical integrity, of which the authorities had or ought to have had knowledge (see, among many other examples, Pantea v. Romania, no. 33343/96, § 190, ECHR 2003-VI (extracts), and Premininy v. Russia, no. 44973/04, § 84, 10 February 2011). - EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 25001/07
STASI c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2013 - 11160/07
The extent of this obligation of protection depends on the particular circumstances of each case (see Stasi v. France, no. 25001/07, § 79, 20 October 2011). - EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 44973/04
PREMININY v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2013 - 11160/07
The Court, in its case-law with regard to the protection of vulnerable prisoners, has clarified that the national authorities have an obligation to take all steps reasonably expected to prevent real and immediate risks to prisoners" physical integrity, of which the authorities had or ought to have had knowledge (see, among many other examples, Pantea v. Romania, no. 33343/96, § 190, ECHR 2003-VI (extracts), and Premininy v. Russia, no. 44973/04, § 84, 10 February 2011). - EGMR, 26.04.2007 - 25389/05
GEBREMEDHIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.10.2013 - 11160/07
The Court notes that it has had occasion to clarify the scope of the ruling in the above-cited Pancenko case, and has explained that the regularisation of a person's situation is of itself a sufficient remedy only in exceptional cases, such as those relating to the deportation or extradition of non-nationals (see, for example, Kuric and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, § 261, ECHR 2012 (extracts), and Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France (dec.), no. 25389/05, § 36, 10 October 2006).
- EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 35810/09
O'KEEFFE v. IRELAND
Plus récemment, et dans le contexte de l'article 3, 1a Cour a exigé qu'un État prenne toutes les mesures que l'on peut raisonnablement attendre « pour prévenir tout risque réel et immédiat's'agissant de personnes vulnérables (voir, pour un exemple relatif à un détenu, D.F. c. Lettonie, no 11160/07, § 84, 29 octobre 2013, ainsi que les autres affaires citées dans cet arrêt). - EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 76680/17
D v. LATVIA
Another important factor in the Court's assessment of the State's compliance with its obligations under Article 3 is whether the prisoner was part of a particularly vulnerable group, for instance because he belongs to a category at a heightened risk of abuse (see Stasi v. France, no. 25001/07, § 91, 20 October 2011, concerning homosexuals; J.L. v. Latvia, no. 23893/06, § 68, 17 April 2012, concerning police collaborators; D.F. v. Latvia, no. 11160/07, §§ 81-84, 29 October 2013, and M.C. v. Poland, no. 23692/09, § 90, 3 March 2015, concerning sexual offenders; Sizarev v. Ukraine, no. 17116/04, §§ 114-15, 17 January 2013, and Totolici v. Romania, no. 26576/10, §§ 48-49, 14 January 2014, concerning former police officers). - EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 58271/10
A.S. c. TURQUIE
La Cour rappelle avoir déjà eu l'occasion de souligner que les détenus sont en situation de vulnérabilité et que les autorités ont le devoir de les protéger (Keenan c. Royaume-Uni, no 27229/95, § 91, CEDH 2001-III, D.F. c. Lettonie, no 11160/07, § 83, 29 octobre 2013, et Enache c. Roumanie, no 10662/06, § 49, 1er avril 2014 et, plus récemment, M.C. c. Pologne, no 23692/09, § 88, 3 mars 2015).
- EGMR, 02.05.2023 - 36463/11
S.P. ANS OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Any measures for the protection of vulnerable prisoners should form part of a carefully designed strategy for dealing with inter-prisoner violence (D.F. v. Latvia, no. 11160/07, § 87, 29 October 2013). - EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 19355/09
FILIPPOVY v. RUSSIA
Taking into account the violence Ye.F. endured over a protracted period of time despite repeated requests to be transferred and the constant mental anxiety caused by the imminent risk of physical violence by his fellow conscripts (see, mutatis mutandis, D.F. v. Latvia, no. 11160/07, §§ 85 and 95, 29 October 2013) the Court comes to the conclusion that the failure to provide effective protection amounts to a violation of the substantive limb of Article 3 of the Convention. - EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 37830/16
G.T. c. GRÈCE
La Cour estime que les allégations précitées procèdent de suppositions et ne sont ni individualisées ni étayées (voir aussi D.F. c. Lettonie, no 11160/07, § 51, 29 octobre 2013). - EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 1870/05
IRINA SMIRNOVA v. UKRAINE
This requirement extends to ill-treatment administered by private individuals (see, among other authorities, D.F. v. Latvia, no. 11160/07, § 83, 29 October 2013 and Valiuliene v. Lithuania, no. 33234/07, § 75, 26 March 2013). - EGMR, 01.09.2015 - 56668/12
KORPACHYOVA-HOFBAUER v. BULGARIA
In any event, while it is clear that the authorities have an obligation under Article 3 of the Convention to take reasonable steps to protect a detainee from inhuman and degrading treatment inflicted by other detainees, especially if they have reason to believe that the detainee is particularly vulnerable - for instance because he or she is suffering from a psychological disorder (see Pantea v. Romania, no. 33343/96, §§ 189-92, 3 June 2003), is of young age (see Premininy v. Russia, no. 44973/04, § 86, 10 February 2011), or belongs to a category that is at heightened risk (see Rodic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 22893/05, §§ 69-70, 27 May 2008 (Serbs convicted of war crimes against Bosniacs and kept, unsegregated, in a prison where about ninety per cent of inmates were Bosniacs); Stasi v. France, no. 25001/07, § 91, 20 October 2011 (homosexuals); J.L. v. Latvia, no. 23893/06, § 68, 17 April 2012 (police collaborators); Aleksejeva v. Latvia (dec.), no. 21780/07, § 34, 3 July 2012 (relatives of prison guards); Starovoitovs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 27343/05, §§ 35-38, 27 November 2012 (private security guards); D.F. v. Latvia, no. 11160/07, § 81, 29 October 2013 (sexual offenders); Totolici v. Romania, no. 26576/10, §§ 48-49, 14 January 2014 (police officers); and M.C. v. Poland, no. 23692/09, § 90, 3 March 2015 (persons accused of sexually abusing minors)) - or to believe that the other detainees have an increased propensity to violence (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, §§ 57-60, ECHR 2002-II, and Oshurko v. Ukraine, no. 33108/05, § 72, 8 September 2011), there is no evidence - and the applicant has not elaborated on that point either - that in her case the hospital staff knew or ought to have known that she stood a real risk of being assaulted by the other patient in the shower.
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 04.04.2018 - 23893/06, 11160/07 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
J.L. CONTRE LA LETTONIE ET 1 AUTRE AFFAIRE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
J.L. AGAINST LATVIA AND 1 OTHER CASE
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 23893/06
- EGMR, 04.04.2018 - 23893/06, 11160/07