Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.02.2017 - 12138/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,1860) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AURELIAN OPREA CONTRE LA ROUMANIE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AURELIAN OPREA AGAINST ROMANIA
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08
- EGMR, 01.02.2017 - 12138/08
Wird zitiert von ... (4)
- EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 17224/11
MEDZLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRCKO AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
The applicants, who were not employees of the BD radio station, had no exclusive access to and direct knowledge of that information (see Aurelian Oprea v. Romania, no. 12138/08, § 59, 19 January 2016), but they apparently acted as "a vehicle for communication" (see paragraph 45 above) between the radio's employees (regarding the alleged misconduct of M.S. in the workplace) and the BD authorities. - EGMR, 09.01.2018 - 13003/04
CATALAN c. ROUMANIE
De surcroît, la Cour estime que la présente affaire soulève une question distincte de celles relatives à la dénonciation par des employés de conduites ou d'actes illicites constatés sur leur lieu de travail, effectuée sous la forme d'une divulgation d'informations ou de documents dont ils auraient pris connaissance dans l'exercice de leur mission (voir, a contrario, Guja, précité, §§ 72-78 ; voir également Matúz c. Hongrie, no 73571/10, §§ 46-47, 21 octobre 2014, et Aurelian Oprea c. Roumanie, no 12138/08, §§ 61-64 et 69, 19 janvier 2016). - EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 52358/15
GENOV AND SARBINSKA v. BULGARIA
But that evidence was silent on the exact sums already paid (contrast Aurelian Oprea v. Romania, no. 12138/08, § 86, 19 January 2016). - EGMR, 15.11.2022 - 43744/17
POIENARU c. ROUMANIE
La Cour estime que la présente affaire soulève une question relative à la dénonciation par des employés de conduites ou d'actes illicites constatés sur leur lieu de travail, effectuée sous la forme d'une divulgation d'informations dont ils auraient pris connaissance dans l'exercice de leur mission (Aurelian Oprea c. Roumanie, no 12138/08, § 59, 19 janvier 2016, et, a contrario, Catalan c. Roumanie, no 13003/04, § 62, 9 janvier 2018).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,210) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AURELIAN OPREA v. ROMANIA
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08
- EGMR, 01.02.2017 - 12138/08
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (12)
- EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 37406/03
DYUNDIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08
The Court reiterates in this connection that senior civil servants acting in an official capacity are subject to wider limits of acceptable criticism than private individuals (see Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, § 47, ECHR 2001-III; Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 80, ECHR 2004-XI; Mamère v. France, no. 12697/03, § 27, ECHR 2006-XIII; and Dyundin v. Russia, no. 37406/03, § 26, 14 October 2008). - EGMR, 25.06.2002 - 51279/99
Frankreich wegen Verletzung der Pressefreiheit zu Schadensersatz verurteilt
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08
[2] Colombani and Others v. France, no. 51279/99, ECHR 2002-V. - EGMR, 29.03.2001 - 38432/97
THOMA v. LUXEMBOURG
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08
The Court reiterates in this connection that senior civil servants acting in an official capacity are subject to wider limits of acceptable criticism than private individuals (see Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, § 47, ECHR 2001-III; Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 80, ECHR 2004-XI; Mamère v. France, no. 12697/03, § 27, ECHR 2006-XIII; and Dyundin v. Russia, no. 37406/03, § 26, 14 October 2008).
- EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93
BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08
As regards the accuracy of the applicant's statements, the Court reiterates that freedom of expression carries with it duties and responsibilities, and any person who chooses to disclose information must carefully verify, to the extent permitted by the circumstances, that it is accurate and reliable (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 65, ECHR 1999-III). - EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08
Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08
40660/08 and 60641/08, § 107, ECHR 2012). - EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85
CASTELLS v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08
[1] Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, Series A no. 236. - EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 13471/05
MENGI v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08
13471/05, and 38787/07, § 48, 27 November 2012). - EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95
FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08
It is true that according to the ECHR's case-law, persons acting as whistleblowers can share information concerning topics of public interest, even if shocking and disturbing; however, they should also take into account the protection of the reputation of others, as provided for by Article 10 § 1 of the Convention (see Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, ECHR 1999-I).". - EGMR, 17.12.2004 - 33348/96
CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08
In addition, in the exercise of the European supervisory duties, the Court must verify whether the authorities struck a fair balance when protecting two values guaranteed by the Convention which may come into conflict with each other in this type of case, namely on the one hand, freedom of expression protected by Article 10 and, on the other, the right of the person attacked to protect his/her reputation, a right which is protected by Article 8 of the Convention as part of the right to respect for private life (CumpÇŽnÇŽ and MazÇŽre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, §§ 90-91, ECHR 2004-XI). - EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83
MARKT INTERN VERLAG GMBH ET KLAUS BEERMANN c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 12138/08
The Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether such a need exists, but it goes hand in hand with European supervision as regards both the relevant rules and the decisions applying them (see, for example, markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, 20 November 1989, § 33, Series A no. 165, and Sosinowska v. Poland, no. 10247/09, § 70, 18 October 2011). - EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02
LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 22.04.2013 - 48876/08
Verbot politischer Fernsehwerbung