Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.06.2014 - 12440/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,13797) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SHEKHOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 34 MRK
Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) Violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - ...
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 38094/05
SIYRAK v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2014 - 12440/04
The above-mentioned shortcomings on the part of the court-appointed lawyer were manifest, which put the onus on the domestic authorities to intervene (see, for similar reasoning, Sannino v. Italy, no. 30961/03, § 51, ECHR 2006-VI; Sabirov v. Russia, no. 13465/04, §§ 45 and 46, 11 February 2010; and Siyrak v. Russia, no. 38094/05, §§ 29-33, 19 December 2013). - EGMR, 27.04.2006 - 30961/03
SANNINO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2014 - 12440/04
The above-mentioned shortcomings on the part of the court-appointed lawyer were manifest, which put the onus on the domestic authorities to intervene (see, for similar reasoning, Sannino v. Italy, no. 30961/03, § 51, ECHR 2006-VI; Sabirov v. Russia, no. 13465/04, §§ 45 and 46, 11 February 2010; and Siyrak v. Russia, no. 38094/05, §§ 29-33, 19 December 2013). - EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 13465/04
SABIROV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.06.2014 - 12440/04
The above-mentioned shortcomings on the part of the court-appointed lawyer were manifest, which put the onus on the domestic authorities to intervene (see, for similar reasoning, Sannino v. Italy, no. 30961/03, § 51, ECHR 2006-VI; Sabirov v. Russia, no. 13465/04, §§ 45 and 46, 11 February 2010; and Siyrak v. Russia, no. 38094/05, §§ 29-33, 19 December 2013).
- EGMR, 05.07.2022 - 50942/08
IVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
That constituted un unjustified interference with the exercise of the applicant's right to individual petition (see Yefimenko v. Russia, no. 152/04, §§ 158-60, 12 February 2013 and Shekhov v. Russia, no. 12440/04, §§ 60-63, 19 June 2014).