Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OLARU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2, Art. 46 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Respondent State to take measures of a general character Just satisfaction reserved (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08, 13136/07
• EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 476/07
• EGMR - 476/07

Wird zitiert von ... (22)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 2916/02

  LUNTRE CONTRE MOLDOVA ET 52 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 476/07

  2916/02, 21960/02, 21951/02, 21941/02, 21933/02, 20491/02, 2676/02, 23594/02, 21956/02, 21953/02, 21943/02, 21947/02 and 21945/02, 15 June 2004).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 476/07

  Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000 VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002 VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, 4 December 2008).
• EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95

  Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 476/07

  Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000 VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002 VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, 4 December 2008).

 
• EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 50425/99

  E.G. c. POLOGNE ET 175 AUTRES AFFAIRES DE LA RIVIÈRE BOUG

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 476/07

  Indeed, the Court's task, as defined by Article 19, that is to "ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the High Contracting Parties in the Convention and the Protocols thereto", is not necessarily best achieved by repeating the same findings in large series of cases (see, mutatis mutandis, E.G. v. Poland (dec.), no. 50425/99, § 27, ECHR 2008-..(extracts)).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97

  BOTTAZZI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 476/07

  The above findings and the Government's acknowledgement of the existence of a structural problem allow the Court to conclude that the violations found in the present judgment reflect a persistent structural dysfunction and that the present situation must be qualified as a practice incompatible with the Convention (see Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 22, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 476/07

  Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000 VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002 VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, 4 December 2008).
• EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 50003/99

  WOLKENBERG AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 476/07

  The object of the pilot judgment procedure is to facilitate the speediest and most effective resolution of a dysfunction affecting the protection of the Convention rights in question in the national legal order (see Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 50003/99, § 34, ECHR 2007-XIV (extracts)).

• EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 60041/08

  GREENS ET M.T. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Il doit aussi prendre ces mesures pour les autres personnes qui se trouvent dans la même situation que le requérant, notamment en résolvant les problèmes qui sont à l'origine du constat de violation (Scozzari et Giunta c. Italie [GC], nos 39221/98 et 41963/98, § 249, CEDH 2000-VIII, S. et Marper c. Royaume-Uni [GC], nos 30562/04 et 30566/04, § 134, 4 décembre 2008, Bourdov c. Russie (no 2), no 33509/04, § 125, CEDH 2009-..., et Olaru et autres c. Moldova, nos 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 et 13136/07, § 49, 28 juillet 2009).
• EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 30767/05

  MARIA ATANASIU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

  Il revient d'abord aux autorités internes, notamment au Parlement, de peser les avantages et désavantages inhérents aux diverses solutions entre lesquelles choisir, tout en sachant qu'il s'agit là d'un choix politique (voir James et autres, précité, §§ 68-69, et, mutatis mutandis, Olaru et autres c. Moldova, nos 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 et 13136/07, § 55, 28 juillet 2009).
• EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 24240/07

  ÜMMÜHAN KAPLAN c. TURQUIE

  La Cour renvoie aux principes fondamentaux qui se dégagent de sa jurisprudence relative à l'application de l'article 46 de la Convention (Bourdov c. Russie (no 2), no 33509/04, §§ 125-128, CEDH 2009 (extraits) ; Olaru et autres c. Moldova, nos 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 et 13136/07, §§ 49-52, 28 juillet 2009 ; Maria Atanasiu et autres c. Roumanie, nos 30767/05 et 33800/06, §§ 210-214; 12 octobre 2010, Vassilios Athanasiou et autres c. Grèce, no 50973/08, §§ 39-42, 21 décembre 2010; Finger c. Bulgarie, no 37346/05, §§ 113, 10 mai 2011; Rumpf c. Allemagne, no 46344/06, §§ 59-61, 2 septembre 2010) ainsi qu'à l'article 61 de son règlement, disposition relative à la procédure de l'arrêt pilote.

 
• EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 48059/06

  DIMITROV AND HAMANOV v. BULGARIA

  A summary of the principles applicable to pilot judgments may be found in the Court's judgments in the cases of Broniowski (cited above, §§ 188-94), Burdov v. Russia (no. 2) (no. 33509/04, §§ 125-28, ECHR 2009-...), Olaru and Others v. Moldova (nos. 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, §§ 49-49, 28 July 2009), Rumpf v. Germany (no. 46344/06, §§ 59-61, 2 September 2010) and Vassilios Athanasiou and Others v. Greece (no. 50973/08, §§ 39-42, 21 December 2010), as well as in the newly adopted Rule 61 of the Rules of Court (which was inserted by the Court on 21 February 2011 and came into force on 1 April 2011).
• EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 37346/05

  FINGER v. BULGARIA

  A summary of the principles applicable to pilot judgments may be found in the Court's judgments in the cases of Broniowski (cited above, §§ 188-94), Burdov v. Russia (no. 2) (no. 33509/04, §§ 125-28, ECHR 2009-...), Olaru and Others v. Moldova (nos. 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, §§ 49-49, 28 July 2009), Rumpf v. Germany (no. 46344/06, §§ 59-61, 2 September 2010) and Vassilios Athanasiou and Others v. Greece (no. 50973/08, §§ 39-42, 21 December 2010), as well as in the newly adopted Rule 61 of the Rules of Court (which was inserted by the Court on 21 February 2011 and came into force on 1 April 2011).
• EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 35729/12

  BARTA AND DRAJKÓ v. HUNGARY

  476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, §§ 49-52, 28 July 2009; Finger v. Bulgaria, no. 37346/05, § 113, 10 May 2011; and Rumpf v. Germany, no. 46344/06, §§ 59-61, 2 September 2010).
• EGMR, 09.04.2015 - 65829/12

  TCHOKONTIO HAPPI c. FRANCE

  La Cour a ainsi pu juger que, lorsqu'une personne se voit allouer, par un jugement définitif et exécutoire, un logement qu'elle a le droit de posséder, d'utiliser et, sous certaines conditions, d'acquérir, elle devient titulaire d'un « bien'au sens de l'article 1 du Protocole no 1 (voir, entre autres, Tétériny c. Russie, no 11931/03, 30 juin 2005 ; Olaru et autres c. Moldova, nos 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 et 13136/07, 28 juillet 2009 ; Ilyushkin et autres c. Russie, nos 5734/08, 20420/07, 54342/08, 56997/08, 60129/08, 4561/09, 7738/09, 11273/09, 11993/09, 16960/09, 20454/09, 21964/09, 26632/09, 28914/09, 31577/09, 31614/09, 31685/09, 32395/09, 35053/09, 36327/09, 38180/09, 45131/09, 48059/09, 52605/09, 56935/09, 58034/09, 59761/09, 1048/10 et 1119/10, 17 avril 2012).
• EGMR - 37346/05

  [ENG]

  476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, §§ 49-58, 28 July 2009; and Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine, no. 40450/04, §§ 73-88, 15 October 2009)? Reference is made to forty-one judgments (listed in Annex 1) in which the Court has found breaches of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on that account.
• EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 55349/07

  BUREA ET AUTRES c. MOLDOVA

  Par une décision partielle sur la recevabilité du 10 novembre 2009, 1a Cour a décidé, dans le prolongement de l'arrêt pilote Olaru et autres c. Moldova (nos 476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 et 13136/07, 28 juillet 2009), de communiquer les requêtes au Gouvernement moldave.
• EGMR - 48059/06

  [ENG]

  476/07, 22539/05, 17911/08 and 13136/07, §§ 49-58, 28 July 2009; and Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine, no. 40450/04, §§ 73-88, 15 October 2009)? Reference is made to sixty-six judgments (listed in Annex 1) in which the Court has found breaches of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on that account.
• EGMR, 10.02.2015 - 17986/09

  PARASCA c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 22267/08

  MALAI c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 33328/06

  MODRANGA ET AUTRES c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 42049/08

  POPOVICI c. MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 13980/08

  IORDACHESCU c. MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 29012/06

  PROTAP c. MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 22.07.2014 - 50905/08

  CHIRICA c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 9209/08

  ANTOCI c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 37262/07

  BÎRCA c. REPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 28355/08

  PADURARU c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 40047/04

  PANTUSHEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 14.05.2013 - 44417/05

  BOGDAN ET CIORAP c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA