Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SERGEY IVANOV v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• spiegel.de (Pressemeldung, 15.05.2018)

  Russland muss gefoltertem Mann 50.000 Euro Entschädigung zahlen

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  IVANOV v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (9)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 14416/06

  Where an individual is taken into police custody in good health and is found to be injured on release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 (see Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no. 336, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04

  POPOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 14416/06

  Furthermore, the Court refers to its settled case-law to the effect that when an applicant has suffered an infringement of his rights guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention, he should, as far as possible, be put in the position in which he would have been had the requirements of that provision not been disregarded, and that the most appropriate form of redress would, in principle, be the reopening of the proceedings, if requested (see, mutatis mutandis, Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 210 in fine, ECHR 2005-IV, and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 264, 13 July 2006).

• EGMR, 24.01.2019 - 76577/13

  Italien verurteilt: 18.000 Euro Entschädigung für Amanda Knox

  Quant à l'utilisation faite des preuves, la Cour observe que les déclarations litigieuse ont constitué en elles-mêmes l'infraction qui a été reprochée à la requérante et, donc, la preuve matérielle pour son verdict de culpabilité pour dénonciation calomnieuse (voir, a contrario, Gäfgen, précité, § 178, mutatis mutandis, Kaçiu et Kotorri, précité, § 118, et mutatis mutandis, Sergey Ivanov c. Russie, no 14416/06, §§ 90-92, 15 mai 2018).
• EGMR, 06.07.2021 - 14929/17

  BEGIYEVA c. RUSSIE

  Celles relatives aux pouvoirs de la police dans le cadre des mesures opérationnelles d'investigation, avant l'ouverture d'une enquête pénale, sont résumées dans l'arrêt Sergey Ivanov c. Russie (no 14416/06, § 56, 15 mai 2018).
• EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 34392/10

  SAYGILI v. TURKEY

  As a result, regardless of the probative value of statements obtained under duress and the impact it had on the outcome of the criminal proceedings their use as evidence renders the trial unfair (see Sergey Ivanov v. Russia, no. 14416/06, §§ 90-1, 15 May 2018).

 
• EGMR, 28.01.2020 - 81535/12

  KILIÇASLAN AND SOGUKPINAR v. TURKEY

  As a result, regardless of the probative value of statements obtained under duress and the impact it had on the outcome of the criminal proceedings their use as evidence renders the trial unfair (see Sergey Ivanov v. Russia, no. 14416/06, §§ 90-91, 15 May 2018).
• EGMR, 10.12.2019 - 10688/12

  SEVIM v. TURKEY

  As a result, regardless of the probative value of statements obtained under duress and the impact it had on the outcome of the criminal proceedings their use as evidence renders the trial unfair (see Sergey Ivanov v. Russia, no. 14416/06, §§ 90-91, 15 May 2018).
• EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 75297/11

  ÇADIRCI AND KÖMÜRCÜ v. TURKEY

  As a result, regardless of the probative value of statements obtained under duress and the impact it had on the outcome of the criminal proceedings their use as evidence renders the trial unfair (see Sergey Ivanov v. Russia, no. 14416/06, §§ 90-1, 15 May 2018).
• EGMR, 28.05.2019 - 5592/10

  UYANIK v. TURKEY

  As a result, regardless of the probative value of statements obtained under duress and the impact it had on the outcome of the criminal proceedings their use as evidence renders the trial unfair (see Sergey Ivanov v. Russia, no. 14416/06, §§ 90-1, 15 May 2018).
• EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 8019/12

  GÜNGÜ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  As a result, regardless of the probative value of statements obtained under duress and the impact it had on the outcome of the criminal proceedings their use as evidence renders the trial unfair (see Sergey Ivanov v. Russia, no. 14416/06, §§ 90-91, 15 May 2018).
• EGMR - 29627/16 (anhängig)

  SENTSOV AND KOLCHENKO v. RUSSIA

  If so, did it amount to torture (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 105, ECHR 1999-V; Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 64, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI; Sergey Ivanov v. Russia, no. 14416/06, § 79, 15 May 2018; Bartesaghi Gallo and Others v. Italy, nos. 12131/13 and 43390/13, § 120, 22 June 2017; Mindadze and Nemsitsveridze v. Georgia, no. 21571/05, § 109, 1 June 2017)?.