Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SNEERSONE AND KAMPANELLA v. ITALY

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 8 Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09
• EGMR, 02.04.2014 - 14737/09

Papierfundstellen

• FamRZ 2011, 1482

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 27.04.2000 - 47457/99

  Bestimmung des Aufenthaltsorts gemeinsamer Kinder nach Trennung der Eltern; Eine …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  47457/99 and 47458/99, ECHR 2000-IV; Bianchi, cited above, § 92; and Carlson, cited above, § 69).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 25735/94

  Fall E. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  (v) "The child's interests" are primarily considered to be the following two: to have his or her ties with his or her family maintained, unless it is proved that such ties are undesirable, and to be allowed to develop in a sound environment (see, among many other authorities, Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735/94, § 50, ECHR 2000-VIII, and Marsálek v. the Czech Republic, no. 8153/04, § 71, 4 April 2006).
• EGMR, 06.12.2005 - 14600/05

  ESKINAZI ET CHELOUCHE c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  (vii) In addition, the Court must ensure that the decision-making process leading to the adoption of the impugned measures by the domestic court was fair and allowed those concerned to present their case fully (see Tiemann, cited above, and Eskinazi and Chelouche v. Turkey (dec.), no. 14600/05, ECHR 2005-XIII (extracts)).

 
• EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 8153/04

  MARSÁLEK c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  (v) "The child's interests" are primarily considered to be the following two: to have his or her ties with his or her family maintained, unless it is proved that such ties are undesirable, and to be allowed to develop in a sound environment (see, among many other authorities, Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735/94, § 50, ECHR 2000-VIII, and Marsálek v. the Czech Republic, no. 8153/04, § 71, 4 April 2006).
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92

  HOKKANEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  To that end they enjoy a certain margin of appreciation, which remains subject, however, to European supervision whereby the Court reviews under the Convention the decisions that those authorities have taken in the exercise of that power (see, for example, Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, § 55, Series A no. 299-A, and Kutzner v. Germany, no. 46544/99, §§ 65-66, ECHR 2002-I; see also Tiemann v. France and Germany (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  In other words, the Italian State has been afforded the opportunity of preventing or redressing the violation alleged against them (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 31679/96

  IGNACCOLO-ZENIDE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  (ii) The positive obligations that Article 8 of the Convention imposes on States with respect to reuniting parents with their children must therefore be interpreted in the light of the UN Convention and the Hague Convention (see Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99, § 72, ECHR 2003-VII, and Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 95, ECHR 2000-I).
• EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96

  Schießbefehl

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  (i) The Convention cannot be interpreted in a vacuum, but, in accordance with Article 31 § 3 (c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), account is to be taken of any relevant rules of international law applicable to the Contracting Parties (see Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 90, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 50177/99

  KÖSE ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  However, it has been deemed acceptable if the final stage of the exhaustion of the domestic remedies takes place after the application has been submitted but before the Court decides on its admissibility (see, for example, Yakup Köse v. Turkey (dec.), no. 50177/99, 2 May 2006).
• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 39388/05

  Maumousseau und Washington ./. Frankreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  The respondent Government furthermore referred to the object and purpose of the Hague Convention within the meaning of Article 31 (1) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which, according to the Court's judgment Maumousseau and Washington v. France (no. 39388/05, § 69, ECHR 2007-XIII), was the deterrence of the proliferation of international child abductions.
• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

• OLG Karlsruhe, 16.12.2014 - 2 UF 266/14

  Internationale Kindesentführung: Unzumutbarkeit der Kindesrückführung in den …

  Es ist daher ein fairer Ausgleich zwischen den in Rede stehenden Interessen herbeizuführen und zu berücksichtigen, dass das Kindeswohl oberste Priorität hat (EGMR…, Urteil vom 06.07.2010, Nr. 41615/07, Rn. 134 [Neulinger und Shuruk ./. Schweiz]; Urteil vom 12.07.2011, Nr. 14737/09 [Sneersone und Kampanella ./. Italien], FamRZ 2011, 1482;… Urteil vom 26.11.2013, Nr. 27853/09, Rn. 95 [X ./. Lettland]).