Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 14743/17   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2022,3934
EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 14743/17 (https://dejure.org/2022,3934)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03.03.2022 - 14743/17 (https://dejure.org/2022,3934)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03. März 2022 - 14743/17 (https://dejure.org/2022,3934)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,3934) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    NIKOGHOSYAN AND OTHERS v. POLAND

    Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5-1-f - Prevent unauthorised entry into country);Non-pecuniary damage - award ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

  • EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

    CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 14743/17
    Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Article 5 § 1 (f) of the Convention (see paragraphs 66-89 above), the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the complaint under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
  • EGMR, 26.11.2015 - 10290/13

    MAHAMED JAMA v. MALTA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 14743/17
    The Court has already expressed reservations as to the practice of certain authorities of automatically placing asylum-seekers in detention without an individual assessment of their particular situation or needs (see, mutatis mutandis, Thimothawes v. Belgium, no. 39061/11, § 73, 4 April 2017, and Mahamed Jama v. Malta, no. 10290/13, § 146, 26 November 2015).
  • EGMR, 22.07.2021 - 57035/18

    M.D. ET A.D. c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 14743/17
    Firstly, the domestic courts did not refer to what appears to be a new element in the case, namely the fact that, while in detention, the second applicant had given birth to her fourth child (see paragraph 56 above; see also, mutatis mutandis, M.D. and A.D. v. France, no. 57035/18, § 89, 22 July 2021).
  • EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 39061/11

    THIMOTHAWES c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 14743/17
    The Court has already expressed reservations as to the practice of certain authorities of automatically placing asylum-seekers in detention without an individual assessment of their particular situation or needs (see, mutatis mutandis, Thimothawes v. Belgium, no. 39061/11, § 73, 4 April 2017, and Mahamed Jama v. Malta, no. 10290/13, § 146, 26 November 2015).
  • EGMR, 19.01.2012 - 39472/07

    POPOV c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 14743/17
    On this point the Court reiterates the principle stated in a similar context, albeit under Article 8 of the Convention, that the child's best interests cannot be confined to keeping the family together and that the authorities have to take all the necessary steps to limit, as far as possible, the detention of families accompanied by children and effectively preserve the right to family life (see Bistieva and Others, cited above, § 85; see also, mutatis mutandis, Popov v. France, nos. 39472/07 and 39474/07, § 147, 19 January 2012).
  • EGMR, 23.07.2020 - 40503/17

    M.K. AND OTHERS v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 14743/17
    The Court takes note of the recent broader context as described by the applicants (see paragraph 54 above) and illustrated by the Court's recent judgment in the case of M.K. and Others v. Poland (nos. 40503/17 and 2 others, 23 July 2020).
  • EGMR, 12.07.2016 - 11593/12

    A.B. ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 14743/17
    The Court has found that the presence in a detention centre of a child accompanying its parents will comply with Article 5 § 1 (f) only where the national authorities can establish that such a measure of last resort was taken after verification that no other measure involving a lesser restriction of their freedom could be implemented (see G.B. and Others v. Turkey, no. 4633/15, §§ 151 and 168, 17 October 2019, with further references, and A.B. and Others v. France, no. 11593/12, § 120, 20 July 2016).
  • EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 75157/14

    Asylbewerber monatelang festgehalten: Polen muss 12.000 Euro Entschädigung zahlen

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 14743/17
    The Court's assessment 44. The general principles relating to exhaustion of domestic remedies are set out in the judgment in the case of Bistieva and Others v. Poland (no. 75157/14, §§ 52-57, 10 April 2018).
  • EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 23685/14

    BILALOVA ET AUTRES c. POLOGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 14743/17
    It follows that neither of the remedies suggested by the Government, as they are of a purely compensatory nature, could have resulted in the applicants' release even if their detention had been found to be unlawful or unjustified (see Bilalova and Others v. Poland, no. 23685/14, § 64, 26 March 2020, and contrast Bistieva and Others, cited above, §§ 58-66).
  • EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 4633/15

    G.B. AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 14743/17
    The Court has found that the presence in a detention centre of a child accompanying its parents will comply with Article 5 § 1 (f) only where the national authorities can establish that such a measure of last resort was taken after verification that no other measure involving a lesser restriction of their freedom could be implemented (see G.B. and Others v. Turkey, no. 4633/15, §§ 151 and 168, 17 October 2019, with further references, and A.B. and Others v. France, no. 11593/12, § 120, 20 July 2016).
  • VG Minden, 28.08.2023 - 12 K 2197/22

    Behandlung, unmenschliche oder erniedrigende Familie Grundsatz des gegenseitigen

    vgl. EGMR, Urteile 10. April 2018 - 75157/14 (Bistieva/Polen) -, vom 3. März 2022 - 14743/17 (Nikoghosyan/Polen) -, und vom 9. Februar 2023 - 11247/18 (R.M./Polen) -, jeweils HUDOC.
  • EGMR, 18.04.2023 - 43966/19

    N.M. c. BELGIQUE

    Cette exigence vise à détecter si les intéressés présentent une vulnérabilité particulière qui s'oppose à la détention et, le cas échéant, à rechercher s'il est possible de leur substituer une autre mesure moins radicale (voir, K.G., précité, § 73, Thimothawes, précité, § 73, et Nikoghosyan et autres c. Pologne, no 14743/17, § 79, 3 mars 2022).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht