Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1990,13338
EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85 (https://dejure.org/1990,13338)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.02.1990 - 11855/85 (https://dejure.org/1990,13338)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. Februar 1990 - 11855/85 (https://dejure.org/1990,13338)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1990,13338) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    H?KANSSON ET STURESSON c. SUÈDE

    Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation de l'Art. 6-1 Non-violation de P1-1 et 14+P1-1 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 13 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure nationale Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN

    Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 6-1 No violation of P1-1 and 14+P1-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • 15/1988/159/215
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (216)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 25.10.1989 - 10842/84

    ALLAN JACOBSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85
    Regarding the lawfulness of the impugned measures, the Court would recall that its power to review compliance with domestic law is limited (see, inter alia, the Allan Jacobsson judgment of 25 October 1989, Series A no. 163, p. 17, para. 57, and, mutatis mutandis, the above-mentioned Eriksson judgment, Series A no. 156, p. 25, para. 65).

    The Court nevertheless has to ascertain whether they enjoyed the "right to a court", as guaranteed to them under this provision (see, as the most recent authority, the above-mentioned Allan Jacobsson judgment, Series A no. 163, p. 21, para. 75).

    1 (art. 6-1) (see, as the most recent authority, the above-mentioned Allan Jacobsson judgment, Series A no. 163, p. 21, para. 78).

  • EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

    LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85
    Admittedly neither the letter nor the spirit of this provision prevents a person from waiving of his own free will, either expressly or tacitly, the entitlement to have his case heard in public (see, inter alia, the Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 25, para. 59, and the H. v. Belgium judgment of 30 November 1987, Series A no. 127, p. 36, para. 54).

    While in some earlier cases dealt with by the Court the confidentiality of the proceedings at issue stemmed from legislation (see the above-mentioned Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment, Series A no. 43, and the Albert and Le Compte judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58) or practice (see the above-mentioned H. v. Belgium judgment, Series A no. 127), in the present case the Swedish law expressly provided for the possibility of holding public hearings: the Code of Judicial Procedure gave the Göta Court of Appeal power to hold public hearings "where [this was] necessary for the purposes of the investigation" (see paragraph 39 above).

  • EGMR, 22.06.1989 - 11373/85

    ERIKSSON c. SUÈDE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85
    It is accordingly not called upon to review the system of the 1979 Act in abstracto, but to determine whether the manner in which this system was applied to or affected the applicants gave rise to any violations of the Convention (see, inter alia, the Eriksson judgment of 22 June 1989, Series A no. 156, p. 23, para. 54).

    Regarding the lawfulness of the impugned measures, the Court would recall that its power to review compliance with domestic law is limited (see, inter alia, the Allan Jacobsson judgment of 25 October 1989, Series A no. 163, p. 17, para. 57, and, mutatis mutandis, the above-mentioned Eriksson judgment, Series A no. 156, p. 25, para. 65).

     
  • EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75

    ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85
    While in some earlier cases dealt with by the Court the confidentiality of the proceedings at issue stemmed from legislation (see the above-mentioned Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment, Series A no. 43, and the Albert and Le Compte judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58) or practice (see the above-mentioned H. v. Belgium judgment, Series A no. 127), in the present case the Swedish law expressly provided for the possibility of holding public hearings: the Code of Judicial Procedure gave the Göta Court of Appeal power to hold public hearings "where [this was] necessary for the purposes of the investigation" (see paragraph 39 above).
  • EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80

    LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85
    The requisite proportionality will not be found if the person concerned has had to bear "an individual and excessive burden" (see, inter alia, the Lithgow and Others judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 50, para. 120).
  • EGMR, 22.10.1984 - 8790/79

    Sramek ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85
    In the light of the Court's established case-law, "civil rights and obligations" were at stake in the ensuing disputes before the administrative authorities on the permit issue and before the Göta Court of Appeal on the lawfulness of the terms of the 1985 auction (see, inter alia, on the first point, the Sramek judgment of 22 October 1984, Series A no. 84, p. 17, para. 34, and, on the second, the Ettl and Others judgment of 23 April 1987, Series A no. 117, p. 16, para. 32).
  • EuGH, 29.04.2004 - C-77/01

    EDM

    12 Nach portugiesischem Recht ist ein "Zusammenschluss" ein "Vertrag, durch den sich zwei oder mehr natürliche oder juristische Personen, die eine wirtschaftliche Tätigkeit ausüben, verpflichten, zur Erreichung eines ... Zweckes gemeinsam eine bestimmte Tätigkeit auszuüben oder einen bestimmten Beitrag zu leisten"; als Zweck ist u. a. das Schürfen oder der Abbau von Bodenschätzen aufgeführt (Artikel 1 und 2 des Decreto-lei Nr. 231/81 vom 28. Juli 1981, Diário da República I, Serie A, Nr. 171, vom 28. Juli 1981).
  • EGMR, 23.11.2006 - 73053/01

    JUSSILA v. FINLAND

    That said, the obligation to hold a hearing is not absolute (see Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, 21 February 1990, § 66, Series A no. 171-A).
  • EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

    Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

    In addition, it must not run counter to any important public interest (see Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, 21 February 1990, § 66, Series A no. 171-A, and Sejdovic, cited above, § 86).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht