Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12, 77503/12, 29316/13, 16683/17, 79906/17, 80338/17, 80340/17, 80358/17, 80374/17, 80378/17, 80382/17, 2940/18, 4841/18, 5270/18, 5340/18, 6493/18, 11453/18 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12, 77503/12, 29316/13, 16683/17, 79906/17, 80338/17, 80340/17, 80358/17, 80374/17, 80378/17, 80382/17, 2940/18, 4841/18, 5270/18, 5340/18, 6493/18, 11453/18 (https://dejure.org/2022,7049)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.04.2022 - 39696/12, 77503/12, 29316/13, 16683/17, 79906/17, 80338/17, 80340/17, 80358/17, 80374/17, 80378/17, 80382/17, 2940/18, 4841/18, 5270/18, 5340/18, 6493/18, 11453/18 (https://dejure.org/2022,7049)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. April 2022 - 39696/12, 77503/12, 29316/13, 16683/17, 79906/17, 80338/17, 80340/17, 80358/17, 80374/17, 80378/17, 80382/17, 2940/18, 4841/18, 5270/18, 5340/18, 6493/18, 11453/18 (https://dejure.org/2022,7049)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,7049) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SEMENOV v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) (englisch)
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 57818/09
LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that it discloses a violation of Article 11 of the Convention in the light of its findings in Lashmankin and Others v. Russia (nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 402-78, 7 February 2017).Article 11 - disproportionate measures taken against the applicant as a participant in a peaceful assembly, namely the applicant's administrative arrest and conviction for participating in an unauthorised public event (Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 402-78, 7 February 2017).
- EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 72881/01
BRANCHE DE MOSCOU DE L'ARMEE DU SALUT c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12
Having regard to its findings above, the Court does not find it necessary to continue a separate examination of this complaint (see Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army v. Russia, no. 72881/01, § 100, ECHR 2006-XI). - EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95
STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12
Their judgments, however, contained no analysis as to why they viewed the "clearly political nature" of the banner as problematic, given that it contained no incitement to violence or rejection of democratic principles (see Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, § 97, ECHR 2001-IX).
- EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 10877/04
SERGEY KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12
Furthermore, the domestic courts omitted to indicate what the alleged differences were between the declared aim of the demonstration and the applicant's banner (see Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 45, 23 October 2008). - EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 40721/08
FÁBER v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12
The Court will examine this complaint under Article 10 of the Convention, taking into account the general principles it has established in the context of Article 11 of the Convention (see Fáber v. Hungary, no. 40721/08, § 19 and §§ 32-41, 24 July 2012). - EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29225/95
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12
Their judgments, however, contained no analysis as to why they viewed the "clearly political nature" of the banner as problematic, given that it contained no incitement to violence or rejection of democratic principles (see Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, § 97, ECHR 2001-IX). - EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 10346/05
EVA MOLNÁR c. HONGRIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12
He acted peacefully and did not create any disturbance of public order (see Laguna Guzman v. Spain, no. 41462/17, §§ 33, 51-52, 6 October 2020, with further references, and, by contrast, Éva Molnár v. Hungary, no. 10346/05, § 41, 7 October 2008). - EGMR, 06.10.2020 - 41462/17
LAGUNA GUZMAN v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 39696/12
He acted peacefully and did not create any disturbance of public order (see Laguna Guzman v. Spain, no. 41462/17, §§ 33, 51-52, 6 October 2020, with further references, and, by contrast, Éva Molnár v. Hungary, no. 10346/05, § 41, 7 October 2008).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.07.2021 - 16683/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,21981) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
YARTSEV v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (4) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2021 - 16683/17
Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Article 10, the Court considers that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and the merits of the complaint under Article 6 (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
- EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 47784/18
ZINCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, concerning administrative convictions for making calls to participate in public events; Mariya Alekhina and Others v. Russia, no. 38004/12, §§ 197-201, 17 July 2018, and Bouton v. France, no. 22636/19, §§ 42-68, 13 October 2022, concerning restrictions of performance as a sign of protest; Yartsev v. Russia, no. 16683/17, §§ 28-38, 20 July 2021, related to the administrative conviction for waving banners with slogans that did not correspond to the declared aims of the public event; Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, and Tsvetkova and Others, cited above, §§ 178-88, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention; Korneyeva, cited above, §§ 62-65, as to the right of the organisers or participants of public assemblies not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence. - EGMR - 41232/18 (anhängig)
POPOV v. RUSSIAd 29 other applications
See Yartsev v. Russia, no. 16683/17, §§ 33-38, 20 July 2021,.See Yartsev v. Russia, no. 16683/17, §§ 33-38, 20 July 2021.
- EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 2954/18
MAZANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
25501/07 and 4 others, 26 April 2016, concerning disproportionate measure taken against participants in solo manifestations, Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, 5 January 2016, concerning disproportionate measures taken by authorities against organisers and participants of public assemblies, and Tsvetkova and Others, cited above, §§ 178-91, concerning lack of a suspensive effect of an appeal and immediate execution of a sentence of administrative detention; Korneyeva, cited above, §§ 44-65, concerning right not to be tried or punished twice; and Yartsev v. Russia, no. 16683/17, §§ 22-38, 20 July 2021, concerning restrictions on the right to freedom of expression). - EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 83654/17
SAVELYEVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016, concerning absence of a prosecuting party from the administrative proceedings; Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, concerning delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal; Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia, nos. 60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, concerning administrative convictions for making calls to participate in public events; Korneyeva, cited above, §§ 44-65, concerning right not to be tried or punished twice; and Yartsev v. Russia, no. 16683/17, §§ 22-38, 20 July 2021, concerning restrictions on the right to freedom of expression).