Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CHOPENKO v. UKRAINE

  Art. 6, Art. 6+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
  Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance Article 6 - Right to a fair trial) Article 6-1 - Fair hearing Equality of arms) (Article 6-3-c - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 14861/89

  LALA c. PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 17735/06

  In any event, it follows from the guarantees secured in Article 6 § 3 (c), and is of crucial importance for the fairness of the criminal justice system in general, that the accused must be adequately defended, both at first instance and on appeal (see Lala v. the Netherlands, 22 September 1994, § 33, Series A no. 297-A).
• EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

  IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 17735/06

  Thus, Article 6 - especially paragraph 3 thereof - may be relevant before a case is sent for trial if and so far as the fairness of the trial is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with its provisions (see Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 36, Series A no. 275; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 131, ECHR 2005-IV; Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, § 50, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12350/86

  KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 17735/06

  The personal participation of the defendant in the appeal hearing takes on particular importance where the appellate review concerns an assessment of their personality and character (see, for example, Kremzow v. Austria, 21 September 1993, § 67, Series A no. 268-B), or where they claim that they did not commit the offences imputed to them and an appellate court is called upon to make a full assessment of the question of their guilt or innocence (see, among other authorities, Dondarini v. San Marino, no. 50545/99, § 27, 6 July 2004).

 
• EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 29731/96

  Dieter Krombach

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 17735/06

  The Court notes that, although not absolute, the right of everyone charged with a criminal offence to be effectively defended by a lawyer, assigned officially if need be, is one of the fundamental features of a fair trial (see Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, § 89, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 26958/05

  SANDOR LAJOS KISS v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 17735/06

  Any derogation from this principle should be exceptional and subjected to restrictive interpretation (see, for example, Sándor Lajos Kiss v. Hungary, no. 26958/05, § 22, 29 September 2009, and Popa and Tanasescu v. Romania, no. 19946/04, § 46, 10 April 2012).
• EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 26766/05

  Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Zeugen (Recht auf ein faires Verfahren: …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 17735/06

  26766/05 and 22228/06, ECHR 2011; Martin, ibid.).
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 19946/04

  POPA AND TANASESCU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 17735/06

  Any derogation from this principle should be exceptional and subjected to restrictive interpretation (see, for example, Sándor Lajos Kiss v. Hungary, no. 26958/05, § 22, 29 September 2009, and Popa and Tanasescu v. Romania, no. 19946/04, § 46, 10 April 2012).
• EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82

  KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 17735/06

  The personal attendance of the defendant does not take on the same crucial significance for an appeal hearing as it does for a trial hearing (see, for example, Kamasinski v. Austria, 19 December 1989, § 106, Series A no. 168).

• EGMR, 15.11.2016 - 24130/11

  A ET B c. NORVÈGE

  Sometimes the Court refers to the social stigma carried by a conviction as a factor for considering the need for the defendant to take part in the proceedings in person (in a murder case, see Chopenko v. Ukraine, no. 17735/06, § 64, 15 January 2015; in a corruption case, see Suuripää v. Finland, no. 43151/02, § 45, 12 January 2010), or for determining that the applicant's situation must already have been substantially affected by the measures taken by the police in the preliminary proceedings (in a case of sexual abuse of a minor, see Subinski v. Eslovenia, no. 19611/04, § 68, 18 January 2007).