Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DUDNYK v. UKRAINE

  (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

  ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 17985/04

  There is also a requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition implicit in this context (see Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, §§ 102-04, Reports 1998-VI, and Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, §§ 80, 87 and 106, ECHR 1999-IV).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 17985/04

  However, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating the use of lethal force or a disappearance may generally be regarded as essential in ensuring public confidence in their maintenance of the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, in general terms, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 108-15, ECHR 2001-III, and Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, §§ 390-95, ECHR 2001-VII).
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 17985/04

  However, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating the use of lethal force or a disappearance may generally be regarded as essential in ensuring public confidence in their maintenance of the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, in general terms, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 108-15, ECHR 2001-III, and Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, §§ 390-95, ECHR 2001-VII).

• EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 27454/11

  ORLIK v. UKRAINE

  Those decisions were subsequently set aside as premature, but they nonetheless delayed the investigation (see and compare Dudnyk v. Ukraine, no. 17985/04, § 36, 10 December 2009, and Koval and Others v. Ukraine, no. 22429/05, § 82, 15 November 2012).
• EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 35493/10

  BUCHYNSKA c. UKRAINE

  The Court, which is master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case, finds that the complaint at issue falls to be examined under Article 2 of the Convention, which is the relevant provision (see e.g. Dudnyk v. Ukraine, no. 17985/04, § 27, 10 December 2009).
• EGMR, 03.03.2011 - 21454/04

  MERKULOVA v. UKRAINE

  However, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating the use of lethal force or a disappearance may generally be regarded as essential in ensuring public confidence in their maintenance of the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, as a recent authority, Dudnyk v. Ukraine, no. 17985/04, § 33, 10 December 2009).