|EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 17995/02|
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
STOIMENOV v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (applicant) Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (members of the applicant's family) Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings ...
Wird zitiert von ... (19)
- EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06
Chodorkowski: Moskauer Prozesse sind unfairBoth Mr Yeloyan and Mr Kupriyanov were hired as experts by the prosecution at the investigation stage and conducted their expert examination at the premises of the GPO, without any involvement of the defence (compare with Zarb v. Malta, (dec.), 16631/04, 27 September 2005, with further references, see also Stoimenov v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 17995/02, §§ 39 and 40, 5 April 2007, with further references).
- EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08
KARELIN v. RUSSIAIn the context of the principle of equality of arms, in the case of Stoimenov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (no. 17995/02, §§ 40-42, 5 April 2007) the Court also referred to "appearances" when concluding that an opinion submitted by the Forensic Science Bureau, a State agency, was akin to incriminating evidence used by the prosecution and that the refusal of an alternative expert examination and the applicant's inability to challenge the Bureau's report in the circumstances of that case had resulted in a violation of the equality of arms (see also Shulepova v. Russia, no. 34449/03, §§ 65-67, 11 December 2008).
- EGMR, 27.03.2014 - 58428/10
MATYTSINA v. RUSSIAIn certain circumstances the refusal to allow an alternative expert examination of material evidence may be regarded as a breach of Article 6 § 1 (see Stoimenov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 17995/02, §§ 38 et seq., 5 April 2007).
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.